Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DugwayDuke
I am happy to stick to the traditional definition of woman and the traditional definition of vaccine because I do not have any agenda which requires me to change the definition.

You obviously can't say the same.

Red Herrings and projection are not going to work. You are still exposed as a fraud. How about you start being honest as I suggested earlier. Its good for your soul.

38 posted on 03/28/2023 8:52:35 AM PDT by AndyTheBear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]


To: AndyTheBear

AndyTheBear wrote: “Red Herrings and projection are not going to work. You are still exposed as a fraud. How about you start being honest as I suggested earlier. Its good for your soul.”

You can start being honest by explaining why the old definition is more accurate/approprite than the new.
The bottom line is this: if you want to cling to the old definition, then you have admitted that vaccines do not exist since there are no vaccines that are 100% effective in producing immunity. All vaccines are subject to breakthrough infections. Meaning none are 100% effective in producing immunity. It follows then that the new definition is the correct definition.


39 posted on 03/28/2023 9:04:30 AM PDT by DugwayDuke (Most pick the expert who says the things they agree with.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson