Posted on 03/23/2023 9:31:12 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
Bragg is a prime example of todays diversity equity and inclusion or yesterdays affirmative action, he’s an idiot with the right color that’s it
Who or what is Da Bragg, a recently discovered hip-hop talent?
The letter shows that Cohen changes his story when convenient, thus negating his value as a witness.
Stephen Ryan’s choice of words is interesting: “neither the Trump Organization nor the Trump campaign was a party to the transaction ... and neither reimbursed Mr. Cohen for the payment, directly or indirectly.” Since we know that Cohen was reimbursed, plus given a bonus and extra for taxes, this begs the question, BY WHOM? Does anyone know if ALL the installments were paid by Trump from his personal funds?
Cohen just padded his regular attorney fee invoices to recoup the loss. He bill is as legal services.
Ah gee Surrender Monkeys another kick in the ash. Seeing Trump in an orange jumpsuit would have kept you going for a few weeks. Now with the walls closing in on Dollar Hunter Biden and Charlie McGonigal and John Durham still out there what will you do for pessimism?
First, if he is indicted, it will give Trump a huge platform of the Deep State to run on.
What is should be even more frightening to Democrats is the timing of the followup court actions and the Democrats ability to control them. Given the various things discussed in the article, previous legal analysis on statute of limitations, level of criminality of certain charges, ets. the question become will this become a conviction or will it be thrown out of court rather quickly? More importantly, what would having the case be thrown out of court due to Trump polling numbers during certain critical stages of the election cycle? Remember Slow Joe's polling number are just above his all time low.
Moving forward with the case during a contested Presidential election cycle could be the ultimate wild card. I would wager some Democratic Party strategists are examining this card and who it could be played by either side and who has the most to loose.
Personally, I think fat Alvin has the most to loose. If he fails to get a conviction or the case gets thrown out of court, Alvin with be made a scapegoat and destroyed by his Democratic partners.
BUT—EVIDENCE MUST be given to the Grand Jury—
BRAGG is withholding such.
Current laws of Evidence contradict Bragg’s actions.
EXCULPATORY evidence MUST be presented.
“Bragg openly states that he WILL NOT appear before Jim Jordan.”
Wow. Is Bragg going to be sorry when Merrick Garland arrests him for ignoring a congressional subpoena!!
“Bragg openly states that he WILL NOT appear before Jim Jordan.”
Wow. Is Bragg going to be sorry when Merrick Garland arrests him for ignoring a congressional subpoena!!
In most states, prosecutors must present exculpatory evidence to the grand jury. In some states and in federal court they do not. I do not know whether New York requires the introduction of exculpatory evidence or not.
Even in states where prosecutors must give exculpatory evidence to the grand jury, that does not mean that they have to offer every piece of evidence that is helpful to the accused or that might be used at trial by the defense. Generally, evidence that could be used to impeach a prosecution witness as a liar does not have to be given to the grand jury, because it does not directly negate the commission of the crime.
After an indictment and arrest, the prosecutors must produce any exculpatory evidence that they have to the defense.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.