“circumstantial evidence” isn’t proof
you America-haters will have to try harder
““circumstantial evidence” isn’t proof”
If you say it 1000 times, it WILL NOT change the opinion of the 85% of the world that DOES NOT suck up to the Globalists.
They LAUGH at the claim that the SS Minow crew put on a snorkel and took 1500 lbs. of TNT 250 feet down and blew up the pipelines.
You show evidence of having at least one brain cell. I base that on the fact that you are able to login here on a daily basis to support pedoBiden.
Many court cases turn on “circumstantial evidence.” The drawing of logical conclusions from incomplete information is not a bad thing, we all do it every day.
Evidence comes in two varieties: 1) direct evidence such as a confession or eyewitness accounts, and 2) circumstantial evidence.
Circumstantial evidence may, or may not, be proof, but it is still evidence. Many criminal cases are proved beyond reasonable doubt solely upon circumstantial evidence.
All of the circumstantial evidence points to a nation-state actor other than Russia. Various US officials threatened to strike Nordstream before it happened, but this is circumstantial rather than direct evidence.
Seymour Hersh says he has direct evidence, but won’t reveal his source, largely because his source would probably get life in a Supermax prison if exposed.
You Biden-lovers have to try harder.