I think that would be Microsuck
$53 Billion?
How much got laundered to politicians?
Garland?
“Who is giving these orders?”
Same bunch that Musk outed on Twitter, and the same bunch pushing for World War 3 on various conservative forums.
LinkedIn should be free of politics. That’s not what it’s for.
The guy who owns LinkedIn is a big time leftist.
Go to Lucianne.com and say anything someone there does not like and you are blocked.
Personally, I wish we could return to the days were LinkedIn was truly a professional job related website and not all of the garbage politics that is now on it.
$83 bil is a bit too high. $83 million is more believable.
If you are going to report something political to a liberal source, then you should not use conservative sites as he Geller Report or Breitbart, but go to the actual sources they take their stories from. In fact, since so many conservative sites sometimes skew or do not check out stories before running screaming headlines to being readers to see my ads, then then checking out stories is wise in any case, not that I always do.
Ping
LinkedIn hasn’t touched my post of this WND article:
No “truth and safety” nastygrams, either.
I had numerous attempts made to get me to join LinkedIn.
Never could figure out why-—
Have been self-employed since 1980 I not seeking any more clients.
I had numerous attempts made to get me to join LinkedIn.
Never could figure out why-—
Have been self-employed since 1980 & not seeking any more clients.
LinkedIn is dangerous to a professional career. I don’t have an account on LinkedIn. I did, but I started discovering how it is used against people. LinkedIn censors as much as twitter ever did, and it still does.