Tucker’s presentation was very weak when subjected to any sort of critical thinking. All he did was focus on one person, and even then he failed to make the case. Try to present something like that as evidence of someone’s innocence in court and the immediate question from the jury is, where’s the rest of the footage of that person? Without it, one must assume it may be incriminating.
As far as all the rest, of showing Antifa was responsible, or crooked cops, all of which probably happened, we got nothing on those topics. Nothing but partial footage of one guy, who the cops treated nicely. But some people sure are convinced that’s all we needed!
“Without it, one must assume it may be incriminating.”
assume it may be incriminating?
Ridiculous. In this country, you are presumed innocent until proven guilty.
What Tucker showed revealed the deceptive narrative of the entire Jan 6 committee, not the guilt or innocence of any particular person.
What was shown was the horned dude was not really trying to overthrow the government, despite what the FBI claims. The police escorting him around were complicit in whatever he did.
A dope would say...
Stay in your DeSantis lane, GE.