Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

NY Times: Prosecutors tell Trump's lawyers criminal charges are possible over Stormy Daniels payment
Hotair ^ | 03/09/2023 | John Sexton

Posted on 03/09/2023 8:17:46 PM PST by SeekAndFind

According to the NY Times, Manhattan’s DA has warned Trump’s legal team that charges could be coming over his hush money payment to Stormy Daniels.

The Manhattan district attorney’s office recently signaled to Donald J. Trump’s lawyers that he could face criminal charges for his role in the payment of hush money to a porn star, the strongest indication yet that prosecutors are nearing an indictment of the former president, according to four people with knowledge of the matter…

The Manhattan inquiry, which has spanned nearly five years, centers on a $130,000 payment to the porn star, Stormy Daniels, who said she had an affair with Mr. Trump. The payment was made in the final days of the 2016 presidential campaign by Michael Cohen, Mr. Trump’s former fixer, who was later reimbursed by Mr. Trump from the White House.

Michael Cohen hasn’t testified before the grand jury yet and Trump was invited but it’s considered unlikely that Trump would agree to do so.

The Times doesn’t reveal where this is coming from but says the DA’s office refused to comment. For the record, this is a grand jury in New York so it’s not the lady who went on a media tour last month talking about how she wanted to swear Trump in. She is part of a separate grand jury in Georgia. But obviously someone is talking.

As for Trump’s team, they called this report “simply insane” and “an embarrassment to Democrat prosecutors.” While that might sound like Trumpian hyperbole, in this case I’m not sure it is. The case Bragg is attempting to bring sounds like a real long shot.

The basis of the case is a claim that Trump’s company falsified business records by claiming reimbursement payments made to Michael Cohen were legal expenses when in fact Cohen was not his lawyer at the time. Instead, Trump was allegedly repaying Cohen in installments for the $130,000 payment Cohen made to Stormy Daniels. But the business records charge would only be a misdemeanor. In order to elevate it to a low level felony, Bragg would also have to prove the falsification of records was done to conceal another crime. I’ll let the Times explain Bragg’s theory of the case:

In this case, that second crime could be a violation of New York State election law. While hush money is not inherently illegal, the prosecutors could argue that the $130,000 payout effectively became an improper donation to Mr. Trump’s campaign, under the theory that because the money silenced Ms. Daniels, it benefited his candidacy.

Combining the criminal charge with a violation of state election law would be a novel legal theory for any criminal case, let alone one against the former president, raising the possibility that a judge or appellate court could throw it out or reduce the felony charge to a misdemeanor.

This sounds pretty thin. If a conservative DA were trying this convoluted theory out against former president Obama, you can imagine how the media would treat it. They wouldn’t just call it a novel legal theory, they’d trash it as a partisan witch hunt by a partisan DA. It’s pretty hard to avoid the conclusion that’s what’s going on here. DA Bragg is a) looking to make a name for himself as the guy who indicted Trump and b) counting on New York jurors to go along with whatever bull puckey he puts before them so long as it means they can get Trump.



TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: attainder; bloggers; criminalcharges; demwetdream; harassment; newsforumabuse; prosecution; searchandfind; searchkaren; searchsucks; searchworks; stormydaniels; tds; trump
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-29 last
To: Trumpisourlastchance

This is what a failed prosecutor looks like.


21 posted on 03/10/2023 3:10:36 AM PST by MrRelevant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Michael Cohen is a liar.


22 posted on 03/10/2023 4:35:30 AM PST by sauropod (“If they don’t believe our lies, well, that’s just conspiracy theorist stuff, there.”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Bkmk


23 posted on 03/10/2023 4:39:17 AM PST by sauropod (“If they don’t believe our lies, well, that’s just conspiracy theorist stuff, there.”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

I don’t know the details of what happened but it looks like Person A was threatening to come after Person B “legally”.

Person B paid Person A an agreed amount to “settle” the matter rather than pay mega bucks to defend himself to say nothing of his “time”.

This is done every day in America. It’s called “nuisance value”. I’ve done it myself several times. Just another desperate ploy to keep Trump out of the White House.


24 posted on 03/10/2023 6:07:57 AM PST by Cen-Tejas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

This is what America has become. Soros financed AG’s in Deep Blue states use taxpayer funds to harass political opponents.

This is now out of control.


25 posted on 03/10/2023 6:09:31 AM PST by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sarah Barracuda

“He” didn’t write it.


26 posted on 03/10/2023 7:51:05 AM PST by SgtHooper (If you remember the 60's, YOU WEREN'T THERE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

After all the years of politicians paying off their mistresses and “one-night” stands, the left suddenly decided that such an outrage cannot go unpunished. It’s called the “Trump” exception to policy, laws, regulations, and morality. Let’s see the pay-outs made through out the past couple of decades from the Congressional “hush-money” fund.


27 posted on 03/10/2023 7:55:56 AM PST by CFW (old and retired)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Guess the prosecutors don’t remember what happened to her last lawyer.


28 posted on 03/10/2023 8:39:19 AM PST by Vaduz (LAWYERS )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

There’s no law against settling out of court. 😆


29 posted on 03/10/2023 8:55:24 AM PST by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-29 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson