[Captain Walker]

I’m not sure why this is even a story. If these military personnel had an option to seek a medical or religious exemption to the vaxx mandate and couldn’t even be bothered to take that minimal step, then what’s the point of standing up for them now? These people were either dumber than rocks, too lazy to bother, or didn’t want to be in the military anyway.

As a purely legal maneuver, I think it would be advisable to reach for all options available before facing discharge (or unemployment). (I think any good lawyer would advise the same.)

But as a matter of principle, any resistance to these shots should not be dismissed lightly; we simply don't know the intent of those involved.

(The instructions to take these shots were simply unlawful orders, and should have been disobeyed for that reason alone.)

[Alberta's Child]

But as a matter of principle, any resistance to these shots should not be dismissed lightly; we simply don't know the intent of those involved.

If their opposition was based on principle then I’d support them 100%.

The issue here is: If that’s the case, then why the hell would they want to get back into the military?

[Cowman]

I have the disturbing suspicion that purging the armed forces of anyone who would refuse an illegal order is exactly the point of this policy

[Macoozie]

“unlawful orders, “

Not FDA approved, can’t be required.
An EUA is NOT a legally compelling authority for mandatory participation in a human experiment.