[Alas Babylon!]

It is crazy that they thought they could just resurrect from the last vote and get more votes for this dinosaur that was first voted on when I, old fart, was a teenager.

[fwdude]

Is the left STILL trying to illegitimately ram this mess through as an “Amendment?” How many times do they need to be smacked down?

[dfwgator]

The ERA? That’s so 70s.

[dfwgator]

What’s next, bringing back WIN Buttons?

[Rurudyne]

The ERA came with a sell by date that has long since passed. It’s dead and good riddance.

[Still Thinking]

Yeah, leftards are all the the law (when it says what they like).

[joma89]

This is proof that most law is really illegal. How many times have laws been put into place because some judge said so? If one judge just said ok, all of a sudden the US has a 38th amendment.

[FoxInSocks]

Not really. That’s how elections are done nowadays — the election season is months long, and votes roll in and counting and recounting continue until well after the “Election Day.”

Although this instance is 44 years later, so it’s been a pretty long time.

[Radix]

What would it accomplish, legalize gay marriage?

[joma89]

Always CCW...always.

[curious7]

This was probably how they declared the 16th amendment as passed, too. A group tried to push a lawsuit over it last century, but it was shutdown.

[RedElement]

The 27th amendment started in the 1790s. Never reached the 3/4 threshold until last 10 yrs or so. However, there was no expiration date on ratifying the amendment. So, when it hit the magic 38, it was certified. That is why the time limit is so important.

[gas_dr]

While the ruling is of course correct I seem to remember from college government class that the USSC has original jurisdiction in cases involving disputes among the states. Should not this be a the USSC to begin?

[nwrep]