Posted on 02/22/2023 1:04:21 PM PST by Coronal
PHOENIX (3TV/CBS 5) -- Arizona Attorney General Kris Mayes has released three separate documents related to the investigation into the 2020 General Election. In a news release issued Wednesday morning, the AG’s office said that agents and staff spent 10,000 hours looking at any possible irregularities and pieces of evidence of voter fraud but lacked to find any.
“In each instance and in each matter, the aforementioned parties did not provide any evidence to support their allegations. The information that was provided was speculative in many instances and when investigated by our agents and support staff, was found to be inaccurate.”
Accusations of widespread voter fraud have been a highlight for a far-right segment of the GOP since 2020 when former President Donald Trump’s claims that illegal votes led to his loss in Arizona and other battleground states. Some of those conspiracies shared on social media claimed proof of satellites changing votes to favor then-candidate Joe Biden, bamboo ballots, and dead people voting. None of those claims have been substantiated.
“The results of this exhaustive and extensive investigation show what we have suspected for over two years – the 2020 election in Arizona was conducted fairly and accurately by elections officials,” said Arizona Attorney General Kris Mayes. She also adds that the office looked at “every conspiracy theory under the sun,” saying it “distracted this office from its core mission of protecting the people of Arizona from real crime and fraud.”
“Voter fraud is rare, and instances should be handled according to applicable laws when they do occur,” continued Attorney General Mayes. “But it is time to work together to defend American democracy and uphold the rule of law. It’s time for the divisiveness to stop, and it’s time for our country to heal.”
(Excerpt) Read more at azfamily.com ...
I analyzed your postings long ago.
You're an "interstitials posting" troll. This means that you like to post about particular issues where information is incomplete, and you can take advantage of that fact [this is also known as goalpost moving]. You can take "strong stands" and post for a time until more information comes in later.
Then, you either move the goalposts, or you disappear from the discussion, only to move on to another of your favored fruitful fields of "discussion".
No matter for you - some of the "seeds of doubt" that you sow take root.
I'll give you a compliment.
You're probably hands-down the most gifted troll I've ever seen on Free Republic, and I've seen and argued with at least 98% of them [I figure that at least the 2% get zotted early in their short FR lives].
Heck - half or more of the posters here don't even realize that you're a troll.
Even Eschoir couldn't pull that off.
Arizona is so corrupt.
Arizona Attorney General Kris Mayes (D)
You're an "interstitials posting" troll. This means that you like to post about particular issues where information is incomplete, and you can take advantage of that fact...
I can't say I've spent much time going back over my posts but it seems to me you're missing an important element.
I often engage on issues where the information is incomplete or nuanced yet the author or poster makes bold claims without supporting evidence, or simply misrepresents the data that is there.
Blaming this report on the Democrats, for instance.
The Democrat AG in Arizona released it, and Associated Pravda plays up the partisan nature of the release.
I normally don't bother engaging with your "facts" because time has shown me that you aren't here for an honest discussion - you're merely here to tout the current Big Government Narrative.
You'll shift the goalposts without a minute's hesitation - as we can see here in your posts about the current matter.
It was a partisan information release by an uber-partisan, for partisan advantage.
Yet you're arguing the other side of the issue.
As I said before, you're "the most gifted troll I've ever seen on Free Republic".
Enjoy your laurels.
And you still refuse to address the substance.
If the report is partisan it's biased towards the Republicans who produced it.
You have yet to say one word about the contents of the report despite being asked directly.
You're trolling.
I normally don't bother engaging with your "facts" because time has shown me that you aren't here for an honest discussion - you're merely here to tout the current Big Government Narrative.
And here you are, touting the current Big Government Narrative on the Arizona Steal.
"Debating" you is a waste of time.
Nice job of trying to turn my very valid observation about your time here on FR back on me.
VERY gifted, as I said. 
Opinion.
And it shows where you're coming from.
Straight from the DU boards.
Look, I know many here understandably want to know more about me so I appreciate your efforts.
But do you have an opinion on the content of the report that's the topic of the thread?
my post #45, above:
"It was a partisan information release by an uber-partisan, for partisan advantage."
She wouldn't have released it if she wasn't able to leverage it for political purposes.
And we don't if or how she may have "leveraged" it.
And ONCE AGAIN, here you are, arguing the Big Government Narrative on open and notorious vote fraud and election fraud.
Straight from the DU boards.
I honestly can't think of a time in your FR career where you used your considerable talents to argue AGAINST the Big Government Narrative.
Curious, that.
It's that "interstitials" thingee that you have going.
I asked about your opinion of the content of the report, not the circumstances of its release.
You might have "missed" where I wrote this:
"She wouldn't have released it if she wasn't able to leverage it for political purposes."
I used to follow the Washington Post [aka the Washingsnot Pest] very closely as the "pulse of the Swamp".
Eventually, I came to realize that reading the words of ultra-partisan political hacks was a complete waste of time.
I came to see that the true facts would come out in the fullness of time, like a good stew on your kitchen stove back burner.
This here stew is still cooking.
We'll find out more about it, and the circumstances in which it was released, in the coming days and months.
No hurry.
Remember, I addressed this facet of your posting behavior in my post #41 above:
"You're an "interstitials posting" troll. This means that you like to post about particular issues where information is incomplete, and you can take advantage of that fact [this is also known as goalpost moving]. You can take "strong stands" and post for a time until more information comes in later."
Lookit you - doing EXACTLY what I told you that you do.
The very best, bar none.
The people who put out this report are just f*cking liars.
Bear in mind that the Cyber Ninjas reaffirmed Biden’s victory in Maricopa County, adding 360 votes to his margin of victory.
75,000 fake ballots in Maricopa county alone. The substance is addressed.
Nope. Full STOP.
75,000 fake votes automatically makes the entire election fraudulent.
Yes, the Cyber Ninjas said the *NUMBERS* show Biden winning, but it is the *NUMBERS* that were faked with fake ballots.
If you are counting fake ballots, the *NUMBERS* are meaningless.
That figure comes from the CEO’s misunderstanding or misrepresentation of two early voting reports issued by Maricopa County, EV32 files and EV33 files. Those are not the proper files to refer to for a complete accumulating of all early ballots sent and received. Those are reports created for political parties to aid in get-out-the-vote efforts during early voting. In actuality nearly 450,000 more mail-in ballots were requested than returned.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.