Commonsense jurisprudence.
How long will it stand up?
To: chief lee runamok
Why do they even need a law? The social media companies are more than willing to censor “hate speech” (you know what that means) without any law.
2 posted on
02/15/2023 10:53:20 AM PST by
Opinionated Blowhard
(When the people find that they can vote themselves money, that will herald the end of the republic.)
To: chief lee runamok
3 posted on
02/15/2023 10:54:41 AM PST by
Williams
(Stop Tolerating The Intolerant)
To: chief lee runamok
Definitely NOT a Klintooon, Hussein, or Xiden judge?
4 posted on
02/15/2023 11:23:57 AM PST by
SuperLuminal
(Where is the next Sam Adams when we so desperatly need him)
To: chief lee runamok
Every time a Democrat speaks it is hate speech—they are always attacking somebody.
5 posted on
02/15/2023 11:25:43 AM PST by
cgbg
(Claiming that laws and regs that limit “hate speech” stop freedom of speech is “hate speech”.)
To: chief lee runamok
How much time and money does NY waste on crap like this? Lawyers must love it.
7 posted on
02/15/2023 12:03:09 PM PST by
ConservativeInPA
(Stupidly is a moral problem, not an intellectual problem. )
To: chief lee runamok
“Hate Speech” is the gateway drug to the Thought Police.
To: chief lee runamok
Duh....how could it go otherwise. Wish these idiots would read the US Constitution.
To: chief lee runamok
11 posted on
02/15/2023 1:32:58 PM PST by
EQAndyBuzz
(“Racist” is the new “Nazi”.)
To: chief lee runamok
Not even a leftist judge would condone direct government regulation of speech on private social media platforms.
Sadly, these same judges would likely not see, nor worry about, indirect government influences, much less direct, inside instructions, as we have seen, on social media platforms, which constitute the same thing.
13 posted on
02/15/2023 6:46:41 PM PST by
nicollo
("I said no!")
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson