Posted on 02/12/2023 11:51:17 PM PST by dennisw
Anti-vaxxer nurse who injected up to 8,600 elderly patients with saltwater instead of Covid vaccine walks FREE from court in Germany The nurse in Germany jabbed up to 8,600 elderly people with ~saline solution The nurse administered the fake vaccines and left people without protection The defendant shared anti-vaxxer posts on social media during the pandemic
An anti-vaxxer nurse who injected up to 8,600 elderly people with saline solution instead of a Covid-19 vaccine has walked free from court.
Red Cross nurse Antje T, 39, jabbed thousands of elderly patients at a vaccine centre in Germany with what she told them was the BioNTech Pfizer vaccine but was just a saltwater solution.
The nurse, who administered the fake vaccines at the Schortens jab centre in Friesland, northwest Germany, was given just six months on probation.
She was found guilty of six counts of intentional assault by Oldenburg District Court, Lower Saxony state, on November 30.
(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...
How did the health of the salt water vax group compare to the health of the spike protein group?
I lived in Piedmont for 7 years. I loved OK and Okies.
I’m not a sports fan, so the Texas- Oklahoma thing was not an issue for me at all.
My daughter graduated from College at OU.
Yes, TX and OK are very much alike.
Good question.
Several years ago, a former editor admitted that 50% of sports reporting is written by software programs.
Probably up to 90% by now!
A.new age, compassionate Irena Sendler. Thank God for His angels of mercy.
https://allthatsinteresting.com/irena-sendler
The nurse administered the fake vaccines and left people without myocarditis and strokes.
Fixed it for you.
Own the wrong...
TO write.
Yes, there is.
I guess he couldn’t.
So you can prove that non of the elderly exactly whom COVID kills with Pat efficiency didn’t die? And I am sure others will support her unlawful behavior once again giving rise to the hypocrisy of the antivaxx side who claim religious zeal and righteousness. Let’s actually look at this through the Lena’s of faith and fact
1. She is an RN. She chose a profession where she is not granted autonomous judgment. If she was so against vaccine that she was willing to commit fraud and breach every standard of ethics of her profession she simply should have left the profession.
1. No doubt she will be a hero in some eyes here because she confirms their biases. Suppose she were working in a pregnancy rescue clinic. Suppose that in this clinic single women who are scared get their positive pregnancy test as with many crises pregnancy centers the women have little access to care so a physician follows these patients as crises pregnancy clinics promote carrying the baby to term and providing care and support. They are wonderful at saving babies from the abortion butchers. So the doctor orders prenatal vitamins and gives the first week in samples to the patient. This nurse in this story disagrees and thinks abortion should be an option. So when she gets this patient’s meds ready she doesn’t give prenatal vitamins she gives abortion pills. How do you feel now? In this situation the exact same facts but now it violates pro-lofe efforts. Is she still a hero?
3. My understanding of the faith is that lying and disobeying is evil. So this nurse did both. Wouldn’t by example of our Savior, Jesus instead tell the truth and even if persecuted for the truth doesn’t Jesus tell is there is virtue in proclaiming the truth boldly? Instead in this situation the nurse lied and was willing to hurt people for her agenda. The problem with rhe hero worship of this nurse outside calling evil good is that at a minimum COVID vaccination is controversial enough that one cannot reasonably say his or her position is settled. This is exactly why people should be able to make an informed choice. Something this nurse and the antivaxx crowd would take away.
This is a wonderful story in which we can objectively assess the trineaa — or the hypocrisy of both sides.
Price snd save 8600 lives. Your statement on its face makes the following assumptions
1. This vaccine causes death 100% of the time. Do you believe this? Are you able to show evidence of same? Or are you merely making an opinion and presenting it as fact?
2. The people vaccinated — do goi concede that at least some of them chose to be vaccinated? Do you believe that people should be deniers this choice of free will without their knowledge? If so what else do you believe that you are willing to take away others choices without telling them?
All you have shown through your statement is that you support tyranny and you are ok with deception to achieve it so long as it aligns with your beliefs. That’s a little scary.
Hermann Goring was just obeying orders.
Nuremberg trials II is coming.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuremberg_trials
Agree.
So what is the j incidence of myocarditis and stroke specifically attributable to the vaccine? Your statement supposed 100%
False argument. You are supposing that vaccinating people is illegal. The nazi defense is just following orders turned on that an unlawful order must not be followed. Are you saying that giving vaccination against COVID is unlawful? Pretty shaky ground there. You must believe for the Nuremberg trials to occur that vaccination is clearly meant to kill people snd they those administering it did so with the intent of killing. At least be honest as to what you are implying.
Add her name to the hero wall
Your conscience ought to be screaming. Instead you criticize.
How many people died or were injured on FR by following the “advice” of the propaganda “doctors” who relentlessly mislead and distorted on this site?
The great pharma “doctors” on FR got it wrong. Most disappeared. Will the remaining write a vanity on their reckless/misguided collusion?
you are correct!
My point was that the whole quoted section could have been just two sentences. It seems like someone was paid by the word count.
Again, they're not anti-vaccine. The Jim Jones Jab is not a vaccine regardless of what the CDC changed their definition to.
Go back and read your statement about people being able to make an informed choice. You choose to ignore public testimony from employees of government, social media companies, and pharmaceutical korporations, where they censored actual information that would have allowed informed choices. What part of attempting to hide data for 75 years leads to informed opinions?
I’m shocked that they didn’t throw the book at her. Really. She deserves a medal for saving thousands of lives.
I wonder how she was able to get thousands of doses of saline in vials or syringes. It seems that someone would’ve noticed that quantity early on.
“Your wrong.”
You’re wrong.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.