Replies

So you can prove that non of the elderly exactly whom COVID kills with Pat efficiency didn’t die? And I am sure others will support her unlawful behavior once again giving rise to the hypocrisy of the antivaxx side who claim religious zeal and righteousness. Let’s actually look at this through the Lena’s of faith and fact

1. She is an RN. She chose a profession where she is not granted autonomous judgment. If she was so against vaccine that she was willing to commit fraud and breach every standard of ethics of her profession she simply should have left the profession.

1. No doubt she will be a hero in some eyes here because she confirms their biases. Suppose she were working in a pregnancy rescue clinic. Suppose that in this clinic single women who are scared get their positive pregnancy test as with many crises pregnancy centers the women have little access to care so a physician follows these patients as crises pregnancy clinics promote carrying the baby to term and providing care and support. They are wonderful at saving babies from the abortion butchers. So the doctor orders prenatal vitamins and gives the first week in samples to the patient. This nurse in this story disagrees and thinks abortion should be an option. So when she gets this patient’s meds ready she doesn’t give prenatal vitamins she gives abortion pills. How do you feel now? In this situation the exact same facts but now it violates pro-lofe efforts. Is she still a hero?

3. My understanding of the faith is that lying and disobeying is evil. So this nurse did both. Wouldn’t by example of our Savior, Jesus instead tell the truth and even if persecuted for the truth doesn’t Jesus tell is there is virtue in proclaiming the truth boldly? Instead in this situation the nurse lied and was willing to hurt people for her agenda. The problem with rhe hero worship of this nurse outside calling evil good is that at a minimum COVID vaccination is controversial enough that one cannot reasonably say his or her position is settled. This is exactly why people should be able to make an informed choice. Something this nurse and the antivaxx crowd would take away.

This is a wonderful story in which we can objectively assess the trineaa — or the hypocrisy of both sides.

Your conscience ought to be screaming. Instead you criticize.

How many people died or were injured on FR by following the “advice” of the propaganda “doctors” who relentlessly mislead and distorted on this site?

The great pharma “doctors” on FR got it wrong. Most disappeared. Will the remaining write a vanity on their reckless/misguided collusion?

This is exactly why people should be able to make an informed choice. Something this nurse and the antivaxx crowd would take away.

Again, they're not anti-vaccine. The Jim Jones Jab is not a vaccine regardless of what the CDC changed their definition to.

Go back and read your statement about people being able to make an informed choice. You choose to ignore public testimony from employees of government, social media companies, and pharmaceutical korporations, where they censored actual information that would have allowed informed choices. What part of attempting to hide data for 75 years leads to informed opinions?

She is an RN. ... she simply should have left the profession.

She is a rational human being who cares more about the continuation of humanity than her 'supervisory' physicians willing to sacrifice a patient after costly genetic treatment leads to death. Rational thought should cut right thru personal motives that compromise physicians' judgement as they willingly abandon science to keep their jobs. It's not the physicians who are opening the public's eyes, it's the humanitarian nurses. And most of our physicians are not in the front lines of those saving the lives of the many, unfortunately.

Re: 29 - Good post.

Too bad none of it matters to some.

What’s next? An RN or other medical professional switching vaccines with sterile water because they have a personal belief regarding use of fetal lines in vaccines is morally wrong, etc?

Or some animal rights kook does not give a rabies PEP to someone exposed to rabies because of... reasons?

Those are all valid items for discussion. But as you say, this RN substituted her judgement for that of patients. It’s slippery slope.

She was a coward who lied when initially confronted. And lied again when under questioning.