“You sound just like a demonrat.”
On a scale of 1 to 10, how surprised would you be to find out one of these scenerios had happened...
# The shooting victim knew the couple, and had been having an affair with the spouse. He never charged the wife, the husband found out and shot him.
# There was some other prior interaction with the man, who had reason to be angry, and the couple agreed among themselves to stick to the story that he was crazy and charged them.
# The man was trying to steal a vehicle, the man knew he used excessive force to stop it, but made up the story about him charging his wife to protect himself from prosecution.
I don’t know that any of these happened, but neither does the journalist, neither does the police, neither do you.
No video, no investigation, no nothing. \
Just write a title that what the man said happened absolutely.
Imagine someone kills your son and lies to a police officer claiming your son “charged his wife” to cover up the real motive and what happened.
Would anyone who doubts this be a democrat?
A lot of these psychotic episodes since the clot shots.
Well stated. The “reporters” today were trained at the Randolph Hearst School of Yellow Journalism, where apparently the truth does not matter, but presenting a story that sells newspapers (or bandwidth), does.
The title could be the work of an editor.
“”the homeowner’s fiancé came outside””
The word WIFE was not used so how valid is your analysis?