Posted on 02/02/2023 11:36:31 PM PST by blueplum
...California Gov. Gavin Newsom’s wife charged public schools across the country to screen her documentaries, making as much as $1.5 million, according to a new report.
Siebel Newsom’s non-profit released four films, for which she is credited as a writer and director, advocating for "gender justice." Siebel Newsom's "gender identity" films are produced through her for-profit operation, Girls Club Entertainment, which is then licensed by the nonprofit The Representation Project, to public schools. The Representation Project claims that they fight "sexism through films education, research and activism."...
...The films, which include "Miss Representation," "The Mask You Live In," "The Great American Lie" and "Fair Play," are licensed to taxpayer-funded schools across every state. Gov. Newsom appears in two of the four movies. ...
The films are also packaged with a lesson plan that includes a discussion on Gov. Newsom's comments within the films, insisting that students gather their friends and vote for aligned politicians that support a "care economy"....
(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...
safe and effective...
Union Rats milking the taxpayers to reward their Rat leaders
More like political/campaign advertising.
Indoctrination.
It is also a variation of selling “art” at absurdly inflated values to launder money.
Kinda reminds me of Fort Worthless Jim Wright and his best selling book. Purchased by special interest groups case lots and the cases were never opened.
Just think of it as “our democracy” in action.....
There was also a former mayor of Baltimore with her own book scandal:
And the schools no doubt paid with federal money.
The graft never ends.
How about this -
I work as a contractor in a fracking natural gas company in Texas.
Gavin Newsome and his creepy wife have oil and gas properties rights producing gas in Texas.
And that’s a fact. Mr. And Mrs. Extreme Liberal. Oil and gas production royalty owners.
Who knew?
They’re sure ready for Washington, alright. They got the corruption down pat.
A “non-profit”, huh? Frequently, those employed at such organizations are “for personal profit”. Exhibit A is the Clinton Global Initiative.
Can we even imagine if First Lady Melania had
- started a film company while her husband was president,
- featured him speaking on “issues” that were advocated within the film,
- distributed them in schools across the country, and
- had made millions from those schools?
Un American parasites in white masks
Well at least with Hunters paintings you get a priceless and highly classified document secured to the back of every canvas...
Kinda like a prize in a Cracker Jack box..
Remember the woman who tried to trade sex with Harvey Weinstein for movie roles? She’s quite the little entrepreneur.
More grooming. I mean, think about it. During Gavins political offices in the Bay Area, Nambla was going well and having a political movement. Gavin also support gay marriage. The ultimate goal of gays is to be able to recruit as young as possible. Under Gavin underaged prostitution is not longer a crime. and loitering in a park for prostitution is no longer being pursued by law enforcement. It’s all about grooming and recruiting for sex
And here I thought that not for profit organizations didn’t make money for personal gain.
The films are also packaged with a lesson plan that includes a discussion on Gov. Newsom's comments within the films, insisting that students gather their friends and vote for aligned politicians that support a "care economy"....
And when Ahnold ran for office, the broadcast of all of his movies was suspended in California.
“Union Rats milking the taxpayers to reward their Rat leaders.”
It’s not just that they are ‘Rat leaders. They are part of the untouchable California oligarchy, entitled to rule and to take what they want.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.