Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

BOMBSHELL: NIH knew that grants to researchers were dangerous, but didn't monitor them: Inspector General Report
Hotair ^ | 02/01/2023 | David Strom

Posted on 02/01/2023 8:30:49 PM PST by SeekAndFind

The Office of the Inspector General dropped a new report about the relationship between the National Institutes of Health, the EcoHealth Alliance, and the facilities that received grants from the organization.

The contents do not reflect well on either the NIH or the EcoHealth Alliance. They were playing with fire, knew it, and failed to ensure that safety was front and center when messing with microbes.

The report is entitled quite sexily: THE NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH AND ECOHEALTH ALLIANCE DID NOT EFFECTIVELY MONITOR AWARDS AND SUBAWARDS, RESULTING IN MISSED OPPORTUNITIES TO OVERSEE RESEARCH AND OTHER DEFICIENCIES.

Catchy title, as you would expect from the Inspector General’s office. They have a flair for the dramatic.

Well, the findings themselves are dramatic. As explained by Hannah Cox of The White Coat Waste Project, the NIH at the very least dropped a very important ball. And perhaps, given Dr. Fauci’s fondness for gain-of-function research, intentionally so. We may never know that one way or another.

The Inspector General for the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) just released a new bombshell report that specifically examined three grants the NIH made to the notorious nonprofit EcoHealth Alliance that they were using as a pass-through organization to cover their tracks. EcoHealth was given $8 million between 2014 and 2021, some of which went to the Wuhan lab.

The IG’s audit found a lack of oversight by the NIH and EcoHealth not only at the Chinese facility, but also in other labs that received these government grants.

“Although NIH and EcoHealth had established monitoring procedures, we found deficiencies in complying with those procedures limited NIH and EcoHealth’s ability to effectively monitor federal grant awards and subawards to understand the nature of the research conducted, identify potential problem areas, and take corrective action,” the report said.

Senator Rand Paul and others have been sounding alarms about this problem for while now, but officials in the government have been circling the wagons around the public health establishment and Dr. Anthony Fauci in particular. So much has been staked on their credibility–everything done over the past 2+ years surrounding COVID policies and the fiscal stimulus packages that are harming our economy–that almost no evidence can penetrate the stubborn insistence that everything done by these people is above board.

Senator Rand Paul, who has been at the forefront of bringing these matters to light and exposing Dr. Fauci’s lies, released a statement following the report that said, “The Inspector General confirms what we already knew—NIH failed to conduct oversight of EcoHealth Alliance’s grant awards. The continued funding of EcoHeath Alliance despite its repeated noncompliance with federal regulations and policies further demonstrates the need to reform oversight of risky research paid for the American taxpayers.”

As we recently reported, the Department of Defense just awarded another $3 million to EcoHealth Alliance.

It’s high past time that Congress fully investigates the origins of COVID, defunds EcoHealth Alliance, and reinstates a ban on gain-of-function research (one that we actively enforce this time around).

This was not a minor glitch in the system. The very first sentence of the report makes clear that the NIH knew they were playing with fire, yet did nothing to reduce the likelihood of an inferno resulting: “Despite identifying potential risks associated with research being performed under the EcoHealth awards, we found that NIH did not effectively monitor or take timely action to address EcoHealth’s compliance with some requirements.”

That is the first sentence of the report. They knew and did nothing.

Did they even want to? Or was this a wink and a nod to go ahead with dangerous research, at arm’s length from the NIH? I have my suspicions.

All this begs another question: why are we funding these efforts at all? It’s not like our scientists are actively working at the Wuhan Institute of Virology, and the NIH apparently didn’t check in on some of the work for 2 years. Why spend the money if they aren’t interested in the results?

At the very least, the procedures at the NIH are broken. At worst, they are actively trying to circumvent the restrictions put on American researchers.

Either way, it’s bad.



TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: arrestfauci; covid; donate; ecohealth; nih; researchers; warcrimes

1 posted on 02/01/2023 8:30:49 PM PST by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

If they monitored they might be held responsible


2 posted on 02/01/2023 8:32:57 PM PST by NWFree (Somebody has to say it 🤪)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

They are focused on saving the planet by reducing carbon emissions—so if they kill a few hundred million folks around the world it is mission accomplished!


3 posted on 02/01/2023 8:35:35 PM PST by cgbg (Claiming that laws and regs that limit “hate speech” stop freedom of speech is “hate speech”.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

The results only mattered. they could not really give a &&”@. The hid their experiments through cutouts. This was done so they could tell investigators with a straight face they had nothing to do with sketchy and deadly research to avoid personal consequences and then ask Congress for more funds for them and their cronies.


4 posted on 02/01/2023 8:37:55 PM PST by Liaison (TANSTAAFL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

bkmk


5 posted on 02/01/2023 8:38:52 PM PST by Mark (DONATE ONCE every 3 months-is that a big deal?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

CDC,NIH FDA,HHS....

...time to DRAIN the Alphabet soup bowel.

Spelling intentional because they are FOS.


6 posted on 02/01/2023 8:40:54 PM PST by lightman (I am a binary Trinitarian. Deal with it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Covid Pitch Meeting
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9BepDADNtJA


7 posted on 02/01/2023 8:41:39 PM PST by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion, or satire, or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
There should be consequences.


8 posted on 02/01/2023 8:42:35 PM PST by TigersEye (The Democrat Party is criminal, unAmerican and illegitimate )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
Hardly a "bombshell" here in 2023. This was known -- by those paying attention at least -- in 2020.

The OIG's involvement now is paint-by-numbers governmental CYA. No one will be held accountable, and, more to the point, nothing will change going forward. That's how these things work. To think otherwise is the height of naivete, or perhaps just simple ignorance.

The only question that emerges from this is, why do people still trust their government? About anything? What could possibly be more foolish?

9 posted on 02/01/2023 8:42:43 PM PST by DSH
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
The IG’s audit found a lack of oversight by the NIH and EcoHealth not only at the Chinese facility, but also in other labs that received these government grants.

I certainly would like to have the other labs identified so that someone could keep tabs on what is going on.!

10 posted on 02/01/2023 8:49:34 PM PST by immadashell (Save Innocent Lives: Ban Gun Free Zones)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
All science, in the U.S. and around the world, is shot to hell because those funding research insert biases into the research they fund. Sometimes it is even well-meaning, but bias is the enemy of science.

If a scientist sets out to prove or disprove something, confirmation bias will cause their minds to look at the evidence which supports their bias and disregard evidence that doesn't. It's just human nature and, unfortunately, we are blind to it in this case.

Bottom line: Science must be conducted with the sole aim of seeking the truth by following the evidence, wherever it may lead.

11 posted on 02/02/2023 2:08:08 AM PST by RoosterRedux
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

12 posted on 02/02/2023 4:20:47 AM PST by C210N (Everything will be okay in the end. If it’s not okay, it’s not the end.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson