Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Trump sues Bob Woodward and publisher for $50 million over use of his interview recordings
CNBC ^ | 01/30/2023 | Kevin Breuninger

Posted on 01/30/2023 8:37:33 PM PST by SeekAndFind

Former President Donald Trump sued famed journalist Bob Woodward on Monday over the release of audio recordings of his interviews with Trump, who claims he never agreed to allow those tapes to be sold to the public.

Woodward, publisher Simon & Schuster and its parent company, Paramount Global, “unlawfully usurped” Trump’s copyright interests and other rights by publishing an audiobook featuring hours of “raw” audio from Woodward’s many interviews with Trump, the lawsuit alleges.

The suit seeks $50 million or more which it says is based on an estimate that the audiobook, “The Trump Tapes,” sold more than 2 million copies at $24.99 apiece.

The 31-page complaint, filed in federal court in Pensacola, Florida, alleges that Trump “repeatedly stated to Woodward, in the presence of others, that he was agreeing to be recorded for the sole purpose of Woodward being able to write a single book.”

That book, 2021′s “Rage,” failed to replicate the success of Woodward’s previous book on the Trump White House, according to the lawsuit. Woodward then “decided to exploit, usurp, and capitalize upon President Trump’s voice by releasing the Interview Sound Recordings of their interviews with President Trump in the form of an audiobook,” the complaint alleges.

Simon & Schuster did not immediately comment on the lawsuit.

Woodward interviewed Trump over the phone and in person 19 times between December 2019 and August 2020, according to the lawsuit. Woodward and his publisher assembled more than eight hours of audio from those interviews, plus another from 2016, for the audiobook, which was released last October “without President Trump’s permission,” the lawsuit says.

Trump “made Woodward aware on multiple occasions, both on and off the record, of the nature of the limited license to any recordings, therefore retaining for himself the commercialization and all other rights

(Excerpt) Read more at cnbc.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bobwoodward; lawsuit; trump
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-55 next last

1 posted on 01/30/2023 8:37:33 PM PST by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

I doubt if Trump wins this lawsuit. It would have been better had he never sat down and subitted to an interview with Woodward in the first place. He’s only doing what any so called reporter is expected to do, report on his subject.
In today’s liberal environment, no remark is ever ‘off the table’ when you’re a republican president.


2 posted on 01/30/2023 8:43:35 PM PST by lee martell (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

“filed in federal court in Pensacola, Florida”

Does Woodward live in that area?


3 posted on 01/30/2023 8:44:13 PM PST by Brian Griffin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

> Woodward interviewed Trump over the phone and in person 19 times between December 2019 and August 2020

19 mistakes.


4 posted on 01/30/2023 8:44:28 PM PST by ArcadeQuarters (You can't remove RINOs by voting for them!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

I would imagine that Woodward made sure that he had the authority to release those recordings. Most likely in some paperwork that Trump signed.


5 posted on 01/30/2023 8:47:31 PM PST by Coronal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
Trump “made Woodward aware on multiple occasions, both on and off the record, of the nature of the limited license to any recordings, therefore retaining for himself the commercialization and all other rights

Ever in writing?

6 posted on 01/30/2023 8:48:23 PM PST by BookmanTheJanitor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Another example of Trump self sabotage.


7 posted on 01/30/2023 8:49:01 PM PST by newzjunkey (Trump is disloyal and cannot win in 2024)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

With the border disaster, inflation, North Korea, Russia, Iran, runaway inflation, corruption at the DOJ and FBI, one would think Trump had better things to focus on and do.


8 posted on 01/30/2023 8:49:11 PM PST by Pirate Ragnar (Be calm and act.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

If Trump did not at least try to sue, it merely teaches the left that they can get away with anything. But it won’t stop them from trying again. This is war.


9 posted on 01/30/2023 8:53:59 PM PST by Deaf and Discerning
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
I read the Complaint:

Wrong venue for starters. Trump filing for injunctive relief now is a joke. Trump claiming that there is a contract because he repeatedly said “This is for the book only” is a losing argument.

10 posted on 01/30/2023 9:20:54 PM PST by thegagline (Sic semper tyrannis! Goldwater 2024)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brian Griffin
#3: "Does Woodward live in that area? [Pensacola]"

Good question. A Pensacola jury would certainly favor Trump. Woodward probably will try to get the venue changed to Darktown DC where the dusky jury pool are inclined toward a dark prejudicial take on President Trump.

11 posted on 01/30/2023 9:22:42 PM PST by Governor Dinwiddie (LORD, grant thy people grace to withstand the temptations of the world, the flesh, and the devil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: newzjunkey

Indeed. And it seems an odd theory. If there was an agreement as to use of the materials, the action should sound in contract. Not my area of expertise but looks like venue on the copyright claimis proper in DC, where Woodward lives per Wikipedia.
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/28/1400
I don’t recall which of Trump’s brain trust strongly advocated for the interview. Still, Trump’s a bright guy, and I’ve never been able to fathom why he thought that the interview was a good idea


12 posted on 01/30/2023 9:52:59 PM PST by j.havenfarm (22 years on Free Republic, 12/10/22! more then 6500 replies and still not shutting up!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: ArcadeQuarters

I could be wrong, but I doubt DeSantis would ever agree to any interviews with hostile media types.


13 posted on 01/30/2023 10:00:49 PM PST by CaptainK ("If life's really hard, at least its short")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: CaptainK; ArcadeQuarters
I could be wrong, but I doubt DeSantis would ever agree to any interviews with hostile media types.

Yea, that's the difference between Trump and his Mini-Me DeSantis.

One is a fearless leader, used to, and unafraid the FAKE-NEWS Press, and the other is a mere politician.
14 posted on 01/30/2023 10:51:45 PM PST by SoConPubbie (Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie

Trump wanted to be loved by lib backstabbers like Woodward. It’s his fatal flaw.

DeSantis has contempt for all of them. Which is the way it should be.


15 posted on 01/30/2023 11:09:01 PM PST by CaptainK ("If life's really hard, at least its short")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: CaptainK
Trump wanted to be loved by lib backstabbers like Woodward. It’s his fatal flaw.

Sure he did, or maybe, just maybe, he's not afraid of them and is willing to face off with them no matter what, while DeSanctimonious sits in the corner and calculates what type of trouble he might get into before he puts his little toe in the water to test the water.

You see, one leads from a position of strength, while Trump's Mini-Me is to calculating, too afraid to actually step out and take them on. Just like the good little lawyer he is, he wants to make sure he has calculated all the risk, instead simply leading and taking the fight to them in ALL situations.
16 posted on 01/30/2023 11:15:06 PM PST by SoConPubbie (Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

I always believed the issue of frivolous lawsuits was over blown. No longer.


17 posted on 01/31/2023 12:01:38 AM PST by joesbucks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie

I always believed the issue of frivolous lawsuits was over blown. No longer.


18 posted on 01/31/2023 12:02:40 AM PST by joesbucks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Pirate Ragnar

“...one would think Trump had better things to focus on and do”

Are you that dense? Trump has lawyers. Trump is not engaged on this. Trump and his lawyers had a conference, reviewed all the elements of the case, and Trump gave them his okay for a suit. That is the extent of Trump’s involvment.


19 posted on 01/31/2023 1:15:41 AM PST by odawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Good! Go after that traitor Bernstein too.


20 posted on 01/31/2023 1:51:54 AM PST by Trump_Triumphant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-55 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson