Posted on 01/30/2023 7:01:13 AM PST by billorites
The Supreme Court did not disclose its longstanding financial ties with former Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff even as it touted him as an expert who independently validated its investigation into who leaked the draft opinion overturning Roe v. Wade.
The court’s inquiry, released last week with Chertoff’s endorsement, failed to identify who was responsible for the unprecedented leak. The decision to keep the relationship with Chertoff quiet is a reflection of a pattern of opacity at the nation’s highest court, whose rulings affect every American.
CNN has learned from sources familiar with the arrangements that the court in recent years has privately contracted with The Chertoff Group for security assessments, some broadly covering justices’ safety and some specifically related to Covid-19 protocols at the court itself.
The estimated payments to Chertoff’s risk assessment firm, for consultations that extended over several months and involved a review of the justices’ homes, reached at least $1 million. The exact amount of money paid could not be determined. Supreme Court contracts are not covered by federal public disclosure rules and elude tracking on public databases.
The justices have long cloaked themselves in secrecy to the point of declining to respond to questions about potential conflicts of interest, or to reveal information about some court rules and ethics codes; or to release timely information about the justices’ health and public appearances.
The court’s decision to keep secret the prior arrangements with Chertoff, whose professional path has intersected over the years with Chief Justice John Roberts and other court conservatives, as it used him for a seal of approval, adds to controversy over the leak investigation itself.
.
(Excerpt) Read more at edition.cnn.com ...
“This seat is currently occupied by Justice Sonia Sotomayor.”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_law_clerks_of_the_Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States_(Seat_3)
[linked to from the Chertoff web page]
Why are the financial ties an issue?
“”Validate, as in, determined that SCOTUS dutifully adhered to an investigative process considered to be reasonable based on the nature of the task at hand, and the predetermined goals.””
Well said - I especially like “predetermined”......that fits just about everything that goes on today! Find a culprit then find a crime!
Yup the fact that they didn’t find a leaker points to The leaker being someone they don’t want to identify which would be 1 of the justices
They also have not disclosed that they determined, as a group, both to leak, and not reveal that it was a group effort.
(But I suspect that’s what really happened...)
SCOTUS says...
“We’ll pretend to hire someone impartial.”
“He’ll pretend to do an investigation.”
“He’ll produce a report that says nothing.”
“We’ll pay him extravagantly to keep his mouth shut.”
Well maybe but easy for us to say. Let’s play it out. Thomas and Alito call a press conference and accuse the wise Latina. Now imagine what happens next
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.