Posted on 01/19/2023 5:24:47 PM PST by Jonty30
I drove interstate trucks for years. The driver is responsible for securing the load.
Exactly. You can’t rely upon other people to the degree that you wish you could.
He was rehearsing a scene.
He pulled the trigger. How is the gun supposed to know it was only pretend.
If you pulled a trigger, with the intent of only pretending to fire a gun but it goes off, are you not liable?
Do actors have intent immunity for their jobs?
That’s incorrect. It is never the actor’s job to check a firearm. That responsibility always belongs to the armorer. It’s basically a ‘too many cooks in the kitchen’ sort of thing. One person - the armorer (and their group) is responsible for making sure the firearms are safe for use. Again, if an actor opens a weapon to check, CUT is called, the armorer takes the firearm, rechecks everything, and then hands it back. Believe it or not, most Hollywood folks don’t know anything about firearms. Armorers do, and it’s their job on set to make sure safety protocols are followed.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.