Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

DOJ defending mask mandate on planes months after Biden said pandemic is 'over'
FoxNews.com ^

Posted on 01/17/2023 2:05:27 PM PST by matt04

The Biden administration is fighting to maintain a federal mask mandate for air travel and other methods of transportation even after President Biden said months ago the pandemic is "over," and despite calls from travel associations to end mask mandates.

The 11th Circuit Court of Appeals will hear arguments on Tuesday from the Biden Justice Department on behalf of the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) to reinstate a mask mandate for air travel, after a federal judge in Florida struck down the mandate last April.

"The Department continues to believe that the order requiring masking in the transportation corridor is a valid exercise of the authority Congress has given CDC to protect the public health. That is an important authority the Department will continue to work to preserve," DOJ said in a statement at the time of the ruling.

...

"The Biden administration is trying to paper over an illegal, sweeping mandate on Americans that is full of massive legal and scientific holes," HFDF founder and President Leslie Manookian said in a press statement. "That a federal agency should be able to just usurp the power of Congress, and violate fundamental individual rights is not only at odds with the law – it defies basic common sense."

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: airtravel; biden; coronafascism; covid; doj; illegalmandate; illegalmandates; mandate; mandates; maskmandate; resisttyranny
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-32 next last
The potato said the pandemic is over, with the exception of planes, trains, etc. masks went away in May 2021 in most cases. Now all of a sudden they want to mandate masks again?
1 posted on 01/17/2023 2:05:27 PM PST by matt04
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: matt04

Reminding the public that government’s boot is still firmly upon the neck of the American people.


2 posted on 01/17/2023 2:09:16 PM PST by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion, or satire, or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: matt04

Over for letting invasion escalate further. Not over for Airplanes. Also mandating updated vax card for flights from Israel to America. Incoherence, thy name is Brandon.


3 posted on 01/17/2023 2:09:24 PM PST by Eleutheria5 (Every Goliath has his David.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: matt04

Awful times.


4 posted on 01/17/2023 2:14:25 PM PST by toddausauras (Trump Lake 2024....Go down swinging!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: matt04

Noticed the NY school systems will now mandate masks. They had many cases of sick days for teachers last semester. Always looking out for those teachers.

Dennis Prager today said: “Don’t let anyone use the word pandemic to you. Correct them that it was a lockdown.”
Also “When someone votes Democrat they vote for pathology. Always.”


5 posted on 01/17/2023 2:14:25 PM PST by frank ballenger (You have summoned up a thundercloud. You're gonna hear from me. Anthem by Leonard Cohen)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: matt04
Could this be a part of the WEF plan to ruin the travel industry for us non-elites? If people say screw the mask, I'm not flying, what happens to airline stock prices?

By the way, WEF and their US members (including all blue cities) want you to only be taking one single short haul flight per year as of 2030.

6 posted on 01/17/2023 2:19:59 PM PST by jpp113
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jpp113

They fight for their desire to inflict future tyranny!


7 posted on 01/17/2023 2:21:49 PM PST by Bshaw (A nefarious deceit is upon us all!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: matt04

They got rid of it a year ago. How would they justify bringing it back?


8 posted on 01/17/2023 2:21:56 PM PST by MinorityRepublican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: matt04

I thought they got rid of masking on planes?


9 posted on 01/17/2023 2:23:14 PM PST by jerod (Nazi's were essentially Socialist in Hugo Boss uniforms... Get over it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: frank ballenger

IIRC, Philly mandated masks on k-12 for “just” 2 weeks after the Christmas break...with the option to extend of needed buried in the policy. Not sure what happened with that. Some city in southern NJ did as well.

I know Boston was considering the same, but never did.

I don’t doubt it will spread to NY, probably not the state level but some schools and citys will do it.


10 posted on 01/17/2023 2:25:44 PM PST by matt04 ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: matt04

Not about the mandate, it’s about the ability of the federal government to mandate masks in the future. If the court finding striking down the mandate is allowed to stand, the feds will not be able to impose the mandate in the future.


11 posted on 01/17/2023 2:26:20 PM PST by DugwayDuke (Most pick the expert who says the things they agree with.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jerod

They did in April 2022. All of a sudden they want to appeal it.


12 posted on 01/17/2023 2:26:21 PM PST by matt04 ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: matt04

I heard it wrong. Sorry.


13 posted on 01/17/2023 2:32:07 PM PST by frank ballenger (You have summoned up a thundercloud. You're gonna hear from me. Anthem by Leonard Cohen)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: DugwayDuke
Not about the mandate, it’s about the ability of the federal government to mandate masks in the future. If the court finding striking down the mandate is allowed to stand, the feds will not be able to impose the mandate in the future.

If the courts uphold this power, the federal government can enact any rules it deems necessary to protect the health of citizens...not just masks.

14 posted on 01/17/2023 2:33:56 PM PST by Erik Latranyi (We are being manipulated by forces that most do not see)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: matt04

At this point in time the crisis has been over for a long time. The continued court cases are all about what powers do elected officials have to enforce mandates.


15 posted on 01/17/2023 2:34:39 PM PST by EVO X ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: matt04

Why would the Justice department even have the authority?


16 posted on 01/17/2023 2:35:24 PM PST by Fledermaus (It's time to get rid of the Three McStooges; Mitch, Kevin and Ronna!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: matt04

17 posted on 01/17/2023 2:39:06 PM PST by lightman (I am a binary Trinitarian. Deal with it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: matt04

Is a mask necessary in the operating theatre?

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2493952/pdf/annrcse01509-0009.pdf


18 posted on 01/17/2023 2:50:54 PM PST by eyeamok (founded in cynicism, wrapped in sarcasm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: matt04

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2493952/pdf/annrcse01509-0009.pdf

The results of the relatively simple trial reported
here could easily be repeated and it would
be interesting to see whether comparable results
are obtained in emergency, orthopaedic, or
other general surgical theatres. The finding that
there was an appreciable fall in the wound infection
rate when masks were not worn certainly
warrants further investigation. This trial was
designed only to see whether wound infection increased,
as had been predicted, when masks were
not worn. It did not. The conclusion is that
the wearing of a mask has very little relevance
to the wellbeing of patients undergoing routine
general surgery and it is a standard practice
that could be abandoned.


19 posted on 01/17/2023 2:55:36 PM PST by eyeamok (founded in cynicism, wrapped in sarcasm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

DOJ has nothing to do with it.


20 posted on 01/17/2023 3:01:19 PM PST by TakebackGOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-32 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson