Posted on 01/09/2023 6:39:31 AM PST by ChicagoConservative27
Godzilla levels another city but the japanese villagers still won’t surrender and leave virgin sacrifice offerings...
Russia is winning in Bakhmut.
For the life of me I cannot understand why Russia does not employ nukes.
Bakmut and Mariupol are both examples of where tactical nukes would have saved at east 10,000 of their own men.
At least 10,000.
I’m surprised Hollywood hasn’t created epic war hero movies staring George Clooney as Zelensky and either Danny Trejo or Danny DeVito as Putin.
For the life of me I cannot understand why Russia does not employ nukes.
—
WWIII mean anything to you? first step is tactical, then limited strategic, then world wide strategic. Does the concept of fallout going into Russia or even Europe register? Utterly stupid idea.
Quick! Send in more Nazis!
Starting to use even tactical nukes leads to things like contaminated farmland and wind blowing radiation all over Europe. They would be an immediate pariah.
This was a war that Russia needed to win quickly, prolonged conflict here will not favor them and will lead to more desperate options. Pulling the cork on the Nuclear genie bottle probably a bad idea.
“Utterly stupid idea.”
You are under the mistaken belief that the west would respond to Russia’s use of tactical nukes...with nukes.
Or other strategic strikes on mainland Russia.
They won’t. No way, no how.
Not over Ukraine.
Ukraine has no strategic value to the west. None.
“They would be an immediate pariah.”
So, no change.
There would be no gain.
Mostly though, they do not posess the capability to strategically use the tactical nuclear weapons. The Russian Officer corps is withered to ineffectiveness. No one knows how to get the nucs out of storage and then actually move them effectively to a point where tey can be used.
“Mostly though, they do not posess the capability to strategically use the tactical nuclear weapons. The Russian Officer corps is withered to ineffectiveness. No one knows how to get the nucs out of storage and then actually move them effectively to a point where tey can be used.”
I’m amused people can believe such nonsense.
You like the idea of Russia introducing nukes to the world as just another weapon when invading weaker countries, or any country they decide to invade, making nukes routine?
Fallout going into Poland would trigger a NATO response and it would be nuclear.
Ukraine has strategic value to the world and to the West. But some here wold love to see the Russian take Ukraine, Bulgaria, Poland, the Baltics, Romania, Slovakia, Serbia and reestablish a modern version of the USSR. And then take old East Germany.
Don’t they say in modern warfare there is no need for tactical nukes. Modern conventional weapons do the same thing better.
Then we would give the Uke’s nukes, and the s**t would hit the fan.
Zelensky’s Holy War – Seizing Russian Churches
https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/international-news/ukraine/zelenskys-holy-war-seizing-russian-churches/
She’s exposing the truth in Ukraine and they don’t like it | Redacted Conversation with Eva Bartlett
(Interesting interview from about eight months ago.)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OzMLPSXb7RU&ab_channel=Redacted
“Holding out against all odds” translates to “we’re about done here” in real-speak.
Maybe, but these are (were) mostly Russia supporters in these places, and they have declared Donbas their own territory. They simply want to bring these places back to Russia, and away from Azov/Nazi West Ukraine and NATO
It would be like Biden using nukes on Texas when they form a military alliance with Mexico and China.
Bert has been off - very off - lately.
Bert - have you bothered to read your own signature lately? It makes not a damn bit od of sense.
Get your s**t (back) together.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.