FReepmail me if you want to be added to or deleted from the list.
More 2nd Amendment related articles on FR's Bang List.
Posted on 01/06/2023 5:36:41 PM PST by ChicagoConservative27
Trump is the one who banned the bump stocks. The Appeals Court overturned Trump.
Talk is cheap.
Ahhhhh… Judge Walker Elrod. This is the same judge who gave a stinging rebuke of the SEC a few months ago for unconstitutionally deciding what rights defendants get in civil actions the SEC initiates.
Talk is cheap.
OK, aside from the bumpstock ban, explain to this dumbass why Trump is against the 2A.
Tell me all the wonderful things he DID (not said) to support the Second Amendment. Tell me about how he sent Congress bills to REPEAL gun control legislation. Tell me about how he got the BATF to be LESS restrictive on gunowners and FFLs.
Tell me all the wonderful things he DID (not said) to support the Second Amendment. Tell me about how he sent Congress bills to REPEAL gun control legislation. Tell me about how he got the BATF to be LESS restrictive on gunowners and FFLs.
Right, throw it back at me to disprove your non-point. You got nothing that proves he is anti-2A.
FReepmail me if you want to be added to or deleted from the list.
More 2nd Amendment related articles on FR's Bang List.
For reference:
5th circuit covers only Louisiana, Mississippi and Texas:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Court_of_Appeals_for_the_Fifth_Circuit
I’ve seen people bump firing using nothing more than their hands and a semi-auto rifle. And doing so reasonably effectively.
I never said he was. Please go back to 3rd grade and learn how to read.
I said "Talk is cheap". And that's all he ever did about 2A: talk. Well, that and encourage the BATF to violate the law ...
THIS is the important part.
Bump stocks, specifically, weren’t the main issue at stake.
The main issue was that Trump was the first President EVER to try to reclassify a firearm definition, via executive order, that led to a prohibition.
It was a horrible precedent, that left the door open for future Presidents to make similar changes, and prohibitions.
Hopefully this ruling puts that genie back in the bottle.
I do not consider a right to fashion bump stocks an integral facet of defending the Second Amendment.
Well thanks for sharing.
L
You’re quite welcome.
Someone saying they “support the Second Amendment” is meaningless, especially when lefties claim that it protects the rights of states to arm the National Guard, or that it only applies to muskets. Until politicians start giving examples of gun control proposals or laws they say do indeed violate the 2A, and why they do, any such claims of support should be taken as worthless. I’m pretty sure Kamala Harris has claimed she supports the 2A, at the same time she wants to ban nearly everything, etc.
What have you done? Petitioned your Congressman to submit legislation? Supported 2A organizations? Lobbied your state legislator to support gun rights legislation? You probably just sit around and bitch.
Have a nice day.
Trump was the one who did this. This as an anti-Trump court decision.
Actions speak louder than words.
Actions on guns shouldn’t be taken by Congress either. SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.