Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Innovation in Science Is on The Decline And We're Not Sure Why
Science Alert ^ | 5 Jan 2023 | Daniel Lawler and Juliette Collen

Posted on 01/05/2023 5:19:05 PM PST by Rummyfan

The rate of ground-breaking scientific discoveries and technological innovation is slowing down despite an ever-growing amount of knowledge, according to an analysis released Wednesday of millions of research papers and patents.

While previous research has shown downturns in individual disciplines, the study is the first that "emphatically, convincingly documents this decline of disruptiveness across all major fields of science and technology," lead author Michael Park told AFP.

Park, a doctoral student at the University of Minnesota's Carlson School of Management, called disruptive discoveries those that "break away from existing ideas" and "push the whole scientific field into new territory."

The researchers gave a "disruptiveness score" to 45 million scientific papers dating from 1945 to 2010, and to 3.9 million US-based patents from 1976 to 2010.

From the start of those time ranges, research papers and patents have been increasingly likely to consolidate or build upon previous knowledge, according to results published in the journal Nature.

(Excerpt) Read more at sciencealert.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: research; science
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-64 next last
To: Rummyfan
I have a hunch. Mind you, it's just a hunch...


41 posted on 01/05/2023 6:05:05 PM PST by ProtectOurFreedom (If you're not part of the solution, you're just scumming up the bottom of the beake)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hinckley buzzard

Precisely


42 posted on 01/05/2023 6:10:47 PM PST by Nifster (OI see puppy dogs in the clouds )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: hinckley buzzard

There are many very significant scientific questions that are not understood but our tools are not sufficient to answer them.

At the fundamental physics level, the LHC energies are unlikely to detect the supersymmetric partners of the Standard Model even though we theoreticially know they should be there. This also goes for the unification of gravity forces with the rest of quantum mechanics. Building sufficient tools would cost billions even if there was a public interest in supporting this science.

Chemistry has fractured into many specialty fields including the basis of life, systems chemistry.

Biology is the science that may transcend the other physical sciences in the coming years in terms of new discoveries. The advancements in synthetic biology are approaching the point of originating novel lifeforms from basic nucleotides using computer designed genes. Perhaps the most profound research is in the field of morophogenic programming. This involves identifying the cellular communication structures controlling the growth of a complex organism from a single cell and reprogramming this cell network to regenerate failed organs and systems. This is independent of the genetic DNA code which makes the proteins but does not architect the actual structures. Such technology could eventually extend life for decades or even centuries.


43 posted on 01/05/2023 6:11:30 PM PST by Dave Wright (i)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Rummyfan
From Wikipedia:

The America Invents Act, signed by Barack Obama on 16 September 2011, switched U.S. right to the patent from a "first-to-invent" system to a "first-inventor-to-file" system for patent applications filed on or after 16 March 2013.

Many legal scholars have commented that such a change would require a constitutional amendment. Article I, Section 8, Clause 8 of the US Constitution gives Congress the power to "promote the Progress of ... useful Arts, by securing for limited Times to ... Inventors the exclusive Right to their respective ... Discoveries.” These scholars argue that this clause specifically prohibits a first-inventor-to-file system because the term "inventor" refers to a person who has created something that has not existed before.

The change has not been short of detractors. For example, the IEEE stated in its submission to the House Judiciary Committee, charged with the study of the Patent Reform Act of 2007, that "We believe that much of the legislation is a disincentive to inventiveness, and stifles new businesses and job growth by threatening the financial rewards available to innovators in U.S. industry. Passage of the current patent reform bill language would only serve to relax the very laws designed to protect American innovators and prevent infringement of their ideas."

44 posted on 01/05/2023 6:16:50 PM PST by T.B. Yoits
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hinckley buzzard
One reason is that people are now being ridiculed or otherwise subjected to aversive behaviors by woketards who often control the pursestrings for research money. Fall in line, mouth the correct mantra, and THEN you might get some research money or have your paper published. Act truly independent and fail to produce product fitting in with the current "narrative" and your work will be buried. Thus, the "can-do" nation America has been hamstrung by a bunch of pantywaists clicking their little weakling fingers over their keyboards, denying social media and internet access, preventing fertile interactions due to politics, to the mavericks of science. And before those mavericks are even ready to contribute to the pool of scientific discoveries, they are nipped in the bud by filling students' heads with CRT or LBGTABCD crap instead of hard science and math, and grossly lowering academic standards to facilitate passing by unqualified students.

It used to be that children went on field trips to museums to learn about great science discoveries and the people who made them, possibly inspiring them to pursue such heights. Now they attend drag queen story hour and lectures by deviant idiots making them question their genders. The libtards are ruining our country and the rest of the world by destroying the age-old standards of right and wrong, good and bad, what is a family, what is a woman and what is a man. How can we expect supremely sophisticated fields like science to flourish?

45 posted on 01/05/2023 6:18:19 PM PST by EinNYC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Rummyfan

Well of course. Everything discoverable has been discovered - there is nothing left.


46 posted on 01/05/2023 6:22:02 PM PST by grobdriver (The CDC can KMA!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rummyfan

CRT-based hiring ...


47 posted on 01/05/2023 6:25:46 PM PST by catnipman (In a post-covid world, ALL "science" is now political science: stolen elections have consequences)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rummyfan

The only real science I hear about now comes from the Discovery Institute...all of it based on intelligent design. So there is some real science going on but not what the culture around us wants to emphasize.


48 posted on 01/05/2023 6:27:42 PM PST by Judy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rummyfan
"Innovation in Science Is on The Decline And We're Not Sure Why"


49 posted on 01/05/2023 6:29:49 PM PST by clearcarbon (Fraudulent elections have consequences.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rummyfan

It’s no longer OK to question the science.


50 posted on 01/05/2023 6:31:02 PM PST by DouglasKC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rummyfan

“ Park, a doctoral student at the University of Minnesota’s Carlson School of Management, called disruptive discoveries those that “break away from existing ideas” and “push the whole scientific field into new territory.””

The fact that there is a doctoral program at a school of management is a good example of why.


51 posted on 01/05/2023 6:37:59 PM PST by ifinnegan (Democrats kill babies and harvest their organs to sell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rummyfan

Because of the idea that science is defined by what politicians say it is.


52 posted on 01/05/2023 6:38:39 PM PST by Iron Munro (Michael Byrd: "Well, she wasn't gonna' shoot herself, was she?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Blond

Skip the blacks, it’s the women. Even highly ranked departments are pushing inferior women into the sciences. It’s been happening for many years. Even scientific journals get in on the act.


53 posted on 01/05/2023 6:45:18 PM PST by Varda
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Rummyfan

I’ll play devil’s advocate and say what if the issue is that the low hanging fruit has been picked and the remaining discoveries are ones you really have to work for.

It wasn’t too long ago you could do groundbreaking scientific research with some magnets and a coil of copper wire. Now you have to have a particle accelerator or a supercomputer etc. IOW the costs and the barriers to conducting state of the art scientific research have gotten higher.


54 posted on 01/05/2023 6:49:58 PM PST by Yardstick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rummyfan

Science has been bastardized in order to make a certain group of people wealthy.


55 posted on 01/05/2023 7:08:24 PM PST by mass55th ("Courage is being scared to death, but saddling up anyway." ~~ John Wayne )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rummyfan


56 posted on 01/05/2023 7:13:39 PM PST by Iron Munro (Michael Byrd: "Well, she wasn't gonna' shoot herself, was she?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rummyfan

Maybe it’s because of the leftist ideology now inculcated in today’s scientists?


57 posted on 01/06/2023 3:10:11 AM PST by sauropod (“If they don’t believe our lies, well, that’s just conspiracy theorist stuff, there.”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cgbg

Science began as a cult under Charles Lyell with a single objective. I would say mission accomplished.


58 posted on 01/06/2023 3:53:50 AM PST by momincombatboots (QEphesians 6... who you are really at war with)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: roadcat

“Kids aren’t interested in becoming scientists”

Do the schools still do science fairs (or whoever did them)?


59 posted on 01/06/2023 5:11:34 AM PST by cymbeline
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Qwapisking
More likely the result of “Group think” where students or workers are part of a “team” so everyone gets credit whether they contribute or not. Free thinkers need not apply.
60 posted on 01/06/2023 9:07:22 AM PST by ABN 505 (Right is right if nobody is right, and wrong is wrong if everybody is wrong. ~Archbishop Fulton John)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-64 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson