This thread has several false and misleading comments.
This Petition has been dead listed and its sitting in the pile of Petitions that won’t even be touched at the January 6th conference by anyone except for one of the clerks to be instructed to put it on the CERTIORARI DENIED list in the next court orders release. Why? Because there has been no Call for a Response. For a Petition to be on the Discussion List at a Conference there would be at least a Call for Response by the Clerk. This happens anytime like this Petition that the Solicitor General’s office puts in their boilerplate Waiver on responding when they think the Petition doesn’t have a chance of having CERTIORARI GRANTED but then at least 1 Justice thinks the case ought to be discussed. Since the respondents on this Case are federal officials then its why the Solicitor General’s office would be given primary chance to weigh in for the respondents. See the docket for yourself and compare it to the dockets of petitions with CERTIORARI GRANTED and CERTIORARI DENIED to see for yourself.
https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?filename=/docket/docketfiles/html/public/22-380.html
So, the question I have for anyone who thinks this Petition isn’t dead-listed is this - why has there been no Call for Response made by the Clerk of the Supreme Court?
I’ve asked this question several times in the past and got none of the Brunson case supporters answering it. I applaud their interest in trying to fix problems in the USA. Good heavens there are some serious problems with corruption in the USA federal government. I do think they are hurting their cause though by ignoring important questions like this, making exaggerations, and spreading false/misleading statements. What’s needed is integrity and forthrightness.
The WAIVER, submitted by the Solicitor General, is the biggest problem with your diatribe.
How dare you bring logic, reason, and actual knowledge of how court procedures work, to a thread with sensational claims on FR!
Re: 11 - Doubtful you will get a response, just as you have not gotten responses in the past.
Why would there be a Call for Response if the case hasn't been accepted yet? This isn't a party vs party, this is Congress / Administration vs We the People. Over 300 defendants. A Call for Response is not required, but the odds of a case being taken up goes from 1% to 5%.
My understanding is that the attorneys for the defence have notified the court that they do not plan to mount a defense so there has been no response. That in and of itself is very strange. If true the Court does not have to have oral arguments and can simply decide the case amongst themselves based on the pleading.
Personally I wouldn’t bet money on this case being heard. But I do think the court put it on the docket for conference as a defensive weapon in case the lame duck Congress tried to Institute term limits. That threat goes away Jan 3rd. So on Jan 6th it will likely be rejected. Although it would be the perfect way to kick this criminal cabal out of power. Otherwise at some point the military is going to have to step in.