Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: CatHerd

So the Russians could not respond to a NATO move on Serbia by moving on a vulnerable NATO member. I suppose you would have seen no reason to enter North Africa in ‘42 as it was far from the actual target of Allied strategy. Yet 200k+ Wehrmacht troops were lost that could have played a role elsewhere.
The potential of an attack on a Baltic state could cause NATO to hold off a move on Bosnia.


31 posted on 12/27/2022 6:22:53 PM PST by xkaydet65
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]


To: xkaydet65

Put down whatever you are drinking or smoking and consult a map. Please.

NATO has no interest in “moving on Bosnia”. Again, please consult a map. Kosovo was a province of Serbia. Bosnia-Hercegovina was a constituent republic of former Yugoslavia. Russia has no interest in moving on the Baltics. You seem very geographically and geopolitically confused.

Kosovo does not even share a border with BiH:

https://www.icty.org/x/image/ABOUTimagery/Yugoslavia%20maps/3_%20yugoslavia_map_1991_sml_en.png


35 posted on 12/27/2022 6:45:25 PM PST by CatHerd (Whoever said "All's fair in love and war" probably never participated in either.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson