Posted on 12/23/2022 7:44:35 AM PST by E. Pluribus Unum
The Texas Secretary of State office has released the final part of its 2020 general election audit for Collin, Dallas, Harris and Tarrant counties, with the most serious issues reportedly occurring in Harris, the state’s most populous county.
The report released Monday states Texas voters overall can have a "very high level of confidence in the accuracy of the outcome of Texas elections" when state election code and local procedures are followed.
However, the audit found Dallas County had two large problems including "phantom voters," according to the Epoch Times.
Secretary of State John Scott ordered the full forensic audit last year amid concerns about voter fraud. It was designed to represent the two largest Democrat-controlled and GOP-controlled counties, Dallas and Harris and Collin and Tarrant, respectively, according to the report.
In Harris County, the problems were severe enough that the Secretary of State’s office notified the county of the audit’s preliminary findings ahead of the 2022 midterm elections, the 359-page report also shows.
The audit included machines and software, security, voter registration, provisional voting, mail-in voting, chain of custody and records management, the Epoch Times also reports.
In Harris County, the audit showed "very serious issues in the handling of electronic media."
At least 14 mobile ballot boxes did not have proper chain of custody records for 184,999 ballots.
In addition, the county failed to provide documentation for the creation of 17 mobile ballot boxes connected to 124,630 cast vote records. And tally audit logs for over two dozen early-polling places and eight Election Day polling locations did not match the electronic records, also according to the Epoch Times.
(Excerpt) Read more at justthenews.com ...
The RATS were stopped twice trying to steal the TEXAS electoons.
Large counties everywhere should be split up into many smaller ones. There shouldn’t be counties with larger populations that the rest of the state.
Only the trial, conviction and sentence of execution for traitorous (Demonicrat) election fraudsters will justly address the problem.
Those that control the electronic equipment have the potential
to control a lot of what gets to the populace be it good or bad.
I live is Harris county. There were approximately 100 county wide offices being voted on in the November 2022 election. The differences in the voting results (R vs. D) were usually within 1-2%.
If I’m not mistaken, the D candidates won 96 of the offices, and R candidates won 4.
Don’t rely on what I said, check out the results for yourselves. It was a travesty.
Perfecting lies told to the People is what lamestream media and politicians do. The liars walk hand in hand …..
And what are they going to do about it? Nothing.
No wonder those counties vote blue.
do they have runbeck offices in DFW or Houston?
how bout Philly?
That re-apportionment would be difficult in Texas. There are several counties here that are geographically larger than about a dozen states but have populations of only a few hundred folks.
Notice that the issue of “chain of custody” not being followed is a common denominator in almost all contested elections and state investigations. The reason, in my opinion, is it is hard to show the chain of custody failures were the result of planned “interference” of the election process. It provides for an emotional argument in court that the VOTERS should not be disenfranchised due the negligence of one or more officials, as was part of the closing argument in the Kari Lake trial, (not actually said but implied by the defense attorneys). One of the last witnesses, the Wisconsin professor, said this outright. This is what they are banking on the court deciding that the failures were not intentional so the VOTERS should not be punished.
bump
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.