In the News/Activism forum, on a thread titled Ukraine Can Win the War. But the Cost May Be Too High for the West., DannyTN wrote: DannyTN: As opposed to what? Losing the war? Letting Russia have the natural resources of Ukraine? Those natural resources are valued #4 in the world!'
ransomnote: NATO should never have overthrown the Ukraine and installed their puppet, signed the Minsk Agreements in order to stall so they could build the Ukrainian army (According to Merkel), and provoked Russia after decades of warnings not to do so. THEN those natural resources could be retained in the Ukraine, but NATO and their puppet regime in the Ukraine wouldn't listen to reason.
DannyTN: You let Russia have those and suddenly Russia has an even larger monopoly control over energy and gas for Europe than they had before.
ransomnote: For some reason, NATO bet it all on their ability to destroy Russia through a proxy war in the Urkaine.
DannyTN: They’ll also have steel and weapons factories that you wouldn’t want to have in the hands of an aggressor country.
ransomnote: Stop provoking Russia to defend itself this way and you won't have to worry about offensive actions from Russia.
DannyTN: And they will also have major control of grain markets in Europe.
If you think this war is expensive, lose it and see how much the next one costs!!!
ransomnote: Can it equal the $144 Billion US dollars in 10 months flushed down the toilet in a proxy war in the Ukraine in an attempt to safeguard the Deep State's headquarters and money laundering capital of the world?
DannyTN: This war is cheap.
ransomnote: Are you crazy?
DannyTN: It’s not costing any American lives.
ransomnote: None that they are admitting to. But they do send in 'contractors' to operate military hardware donated to the proxy war, and those contracters are newly 'retired' military that will resume their military careers after they leave Ukraine.
Also, the military sent an advance team and is showing all the signs of preparing to send in ground troops. They'll do this because they are desperate to save the Deep State assets housed in the Ukraine. Biden and others will grind up as many soldiers and dollars as needed to protect their Deep State hub in the Ukraine.
DannyTN: We’re drawing support from the whole world. And we’re spending 2.6% of our annual budget, to have the world’s second largest army beat down.
ransomnote: We shouldn't have spent $107 billion, and promised another $40 billion on a conflict that only serves Deep State interests. The citizens in the Ukraine deserve our prayers because they are being used as human shields, human sacrifices, and canon fodder in this proxy war.
DannyTN: It’s important that we defend the principles embodied by the UN that countries don’t invade and take their neighbor’s land.
ransomnote: The UN exists to overthrow countries. It uses it's blather about its missions to hide the fact that they were purpose built to destabilize countries, offer 'peace keepers' prone to child trafficking/human trafficking/drug running, then use the 'peace keepers' to prop up the latest puppet regime of the UN's choosing. The UN is evil and part of a corrupt system so don't talk to me about their 'principles'.
DannyTN: If you don’t defend this, you will have aggressor states starting wars all over the world. And then what? Are we going to fight all those wars, are wait until the aggressors get so big they pick fights with us?
ransomnote: NATO is a little more strategic and selective about the wars they start. It's good that their proxy war in the Ukraine is expending their resources or they'd start more wars more often. They are still angling for WWIII. That's why they had their puppet Zelensky fire on Poland and blame Russia.
DannyTN: Learn from WWI and WWII.
ransomnote: I should hope we learned not to have anything to do with Nazi's after WWII, but here were are, propping up the Zelensky regime, with it's neo Nazi Azov military.
Vote at the UN against the withdrawal of Russian troops from Ukraine
The document contains a demand “immediately stop the military invasion of Ukraine and unconditionally withdraw all its armed forces from the territory of the country.”
82 countries voted for the adoption of the resolution, 80 abstained, 14 states voted against. Among them are Russia, Belarus, Kazakhstan, China, Iran, North Korea, Syria, Nicaragua, Eritrea, Ethiopia, Mali, Sudan, Zimbabwe and Cuba.
The resolution was submitted for discussion by the UN General Assembly on 15 December.
And there wouldn’t even have been the whole 82 who voted yes had it not been for the fact that we bribe and threaten countries to support our positions at the UN. We OWN the UN.
Bravo!
NATO is almost wholly responsible for no war in northern and western Europe in going on 80yrs. The last time an Italian, German or Frenchman lived an entire life without being warred on was a long time ago.
I do generally agree with the tone of the post which barely touches the surface of the totality of the corruption.
however denying the US role in inhibiting war in what was the most repeatedly war torn place on earth for an entire generation is inexcusable.