Supposedly these “experts” put their reputations on the line by choosing to put forth their opinion. They had no requirement to do so, it was therefore based on political motivations, not professionalism.
As usual there is no accountability for government “experts” coming out as political operatives.
Bingo! Why did these people feel compelled to come together to write an opinion they KNEW would impact an election? Who brought them together? Why didn’t their “expertise,” based on the open information that that the dossier was Hillary BS, lead them to believe the opposite? Is this an indication of their incompetence? And the biggie...
So, given their “this MAY BE disinformation” hedging, why is it that not one of them ran to the media and complain that their opinion was being misrepresented?