Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: bitt

“The Answer Is Yes. I Believe They Were Involved”

In spook-speak, "I believe" means there is no direct evidence, no "smoking gun."

In Intelligence, it's almost unheard of that all the facts are known. But it's important that your consumer knows how much of your product is fact-based and how much is reading between the lines, so they convey that in their jargon.

If there were "proof," if his certitude had been absolute, he'd have said, "Yes, they were involved" and left it at that.

But he didn't.

If he had said, "I think..," that would have meant the preponderance of available information points to that conclusion. Not absolute certainty, but close.

He used a weasel-word, which left himself a margin of error. "Believe" means that even he isn't certain. And anybody in the Intel community would have read it that way.

22 posted on 12/15/2022 9:09:10 PM PST by Paal Gulli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Paal Gulli

Maybe he doesnt want to die?


34 posted on 12/15/2022 9:28:41 PM PST by vivenne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

To: Paal Gulli

It didn’t have to be the entire CIA - it could have just been some rogue faction.


49 posted on 12/15/2022 10:24:21 PM PST by PGR88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

To: Paal Gulli

Thank you for inserting some common sense to what is always the most crackpot discussion on this declining forum.


59 posted on 12/15/2022 11:05:57 PM PST by robowombat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

To: Paal Gulli

“In spook-speak, “I believe” means there is no direct evidence, no “smoking gun.””

In legal-speak, he would have to say “I believe.” If he said definitely “yes” he would have to present evidence, which he cannot.

Most of us can’t produce evidence of much of what we did in our personal lives last month, but we can believe what we did.


83 posted on 12/16/2022 3:00:03 AM PST by odawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

To: Paal Gulli

But he also knows that going further would identify him, and that using weasel-words would be seen exactly as you say.

If he was identified by the surety of his knowledge he would just disappear, never to be seen again or have a 1” column that so and so had a tragic accident.

It is not possible to accurately parse his words given his position - any one else you’d be right.

But the larger issue is: does one trust TC to be honest here, and not making the whole up to drive ratings?

It is an entertainment show after all.

Then there is the aspect that TC’s “friend” Mike Pompao also refused to release the pages when he was CIA director. More damning is MP’s refusal to discuss the issue on air with TC.

More questions than answers.

Maybe it is all fake and the whole show is being run by space aliens - prove me wrong.


109 posted on 12/16/2022 5:20:41 AM PST by PIF (They came for me and mine ... now its your turn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson