Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Jonty30
It should be tied to counties or something where it can’t be manipulated by politiicians.

Not sure how that's supposed to work in order to ensure that each representative of a district represents roughly the same number of people.

Going by county, or even just city lines, you'd end up with one representative representing relatively few rural people, and one representative representing a lot of urban people, which goes against the purpose of representative government.

4 posted on 12/13/2022 4:26:01 AM PST by Yo-Yo (Is the /Sarc tag really necessary? Pray for President Biden: Psalm 109:8)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: Yo-Yo

“Not sure how that’s supposed to work in order to ensure that each representative of a district represents roughly the same number of people.

Going by county, or even just city lines, you’d end up with one representative representing relatively few rural people, and one representative representing a lot of urban people, which goes against the purpose of representative government.”

That’s not correct. The business of having representatives represent the same number of people stems from the ridiculous Warren Court “one person, one vote” ruling in the 60’s.

Previously, legislatures were comprised differently, with towns and counties represented in the legislature. For example, I live in MA, and each town had a representative in the state senate, similar to each state being represented in the US Senate (same principle).

With “one person, one vote” individual towns and counties have been relegated to non-important entities, with representatives representing several towns at once or parts of towns (whatever they have to do to make the numbers even).

We had fully functioning representative government long before Earl Warren and his band of merry men got in the way.


16 posted on 12/13/2022 5:29:38 AM PST by cotton1706
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Yo-Yo
Not sure how that's supposed to work in order to ensure that each representative of a district represents roughly the same number of people

Agreed. Some counties even have to be split. I think there should be a requirement to keep the district as geographically concise as possible. Computers could do that rather easily.

Making the Districts less overtly partisan, IMO, would do a lot to force our political parties back close to the center.

26 posted on 12/13/2022 6:19:57 AM PST by SomeCallMeTim ( The best minds are not in government. If any were, business would hire them!it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Yo-Yo
Going by county, or even just city lines, you'd end up with one representative representing relatively few rural people, and one representative representing a lot of urban people, which goes against the purpose of representative government.

I understand what you're saying, and that is the way that it's generally looked at, but really, how much commonality do that rural district and the urban one have? I'd argue that by just using raw numbers to group them together, that both groups are ill-served.

39 posted on 12/13/2022 2:55:27 PM PST by zeugma (Stop deluding yourself that America is still a free country.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson