Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

I agree đź’Ż
1 posted on 12/12/2022 4:37:48 PM PST by ChicagoConservative27
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

Joseph Stolen did not get 81 million legit votes


2 posted on 12/12/2022 4:38:58 PM PST by Gene Eric (Don't be a statist!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ChicagoConservative27

Which is exactly the reason they blocked reporting on it.


4 posted on 12/12/2022 4:42:28 PM PST by LeoTDB69
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ChicagoConservative27

then Americans need to get off their ASS and find other sources for news and realize the mainstream media are biased activists trying to control outcomes.

Take some damn responsibility for your vote. 71% didnt know?


5 posted on 12/12/2022 4:44:40 PM PST by Jonny7797
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ChicagoConservative27

This means the election fraud and criminal collusion they engaged in resulted in a stolen election. Pure and simple.

Hopefully Musk won’t permit censorship of this pure and simple fact.


6 posted on 12/12/2022 4:44:41 PM PST by afsnco (18 of 20 in AF JAG)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ChicagoConservative27

That’s all? Social media executives everywhere thought it was about 87% back in September 2020.


7 posted on 12/12/2022 4:44:53 PM PST by blackdog (The head, hands, and heart, serve even further than the purse. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ChicagoConservative27

That’s why it was covered up by fake news

They would do it again if needed


8 posted on 12/12/2022 4:45:55 PM PST by NWFree (Somebody has to say it 🤪)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ChicagoConservative27

If 71 out of 100 people needed to know about the sordid details in that laptop to alter the outcome of the 2020 election, those 71 people shouldn’t be voting.

Laptop or no laptop, Biden is a nasty and mean moron and a puppet and has been his whole political life.


9 posted on 12/12/2022 4:47:26 PM PST by qaz123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ChicagoConservative27

That points 29% of those polled have no room in their lefty little brains to ever think differently than they are told by the MSM.


10 posted on 12/12/2022 4:49:40 PM PST by Blue Collar Christian (I'm a nationalist. I'm white. How does that make me racist?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ChicagoConservative27

Why do they keep doing this poll. What difference does it make..


11 posted on 12/12/2022 4:52:57 PM PST by usurper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ChicagoConservative27

So do I.


12 posted on 12/12/2022 4:54:39 PM PST by No name given (Anonymous is who you’ll know me as. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ChicagoConservative27

I’d wager everything I own that Hunter and everyone else who could give testimony damaging to The Big Guy will ignore any subpoenas they might receive...knowing that people in very high places are sympathetic to their plight.


13 posted on 12/12/2022 4:56:36 PM PST by Gay State Conservative (No Doubt Now: Stolen Election)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ChicagoConservative27

President Trump won 2020. We have a illicit resident in our white house and until corrected nothing will be right.


14 posted on 12/12/2022 5:00:22 PM PST by Recompennation (Don’t blame me my vote didn’t count )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ChicagoConservative27
Another half of respondents said they would have voted differently had they known the Hunter Biden’s laptop revelations were authentic. Interestingly, Republican and Democratic voters were more or less aligned on this question.

So half of the Republican respondents would have voted differently?

Sure.

This is also a poll of people who follow the laptop story closely.

That’s like polling FR.

15 posted on 12/12/2022 5:01:54 PM PST by semimojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ChicagoConservative27

And the other question is ???


16 posted on 12/12/2022 5:17:20 PM PST by sasquatch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ChicagoConservative27

Wow. Polls are legit now. Hard to keep up From one minute to the next.


18 posted on 12/12/2022 5:24:23 PM PST by napscoordinator (Trump/Hunter, jr for President/Vice President 2016 democratic )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ChicagoConservative27

It’s pretty plain.


19 posted on 12/12/2022 5:50:13 PM PST by lepton ("It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into"--Jonathan Swift)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ChicagoConservative27

‘Leading up to the election, many in the establishment media falsely claimed Hunter’s laptop was Russian disinformation. Those false claims were pushed by many in the intelligence community, who suggested in a now-debunked Politico story from 2020 that Hunter’s laptop was “Russian disinfo.”’

“establishment media” / “social media” / “intel community” - all one and the same?

below: 1m to 14m40s: The FBI’s attack on our democracy; lists many of the FBI/CIA agents who moved to Twitter/Meta:

11 Dec: Youtube: 31m41s: The Next Revolution With Steve Hilton 12_11_22 - Fox News
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jvVPtM-44IE&t=70s

during the above, Steve Hilton refers to the following article on the screen. lengthy, but well worth reading:

12 July 2022: Mint Press News: Meet the ex-CIA agents deciding Facebook’s content policy
by Alan MacLeod
Aaron (Berman) is CIA. Or at least he was until July 2019, when he left his job as a senior analytic manager at the agency to become senior product policy manager for misinformation at Meta, the company that owns Facebook, Instagram and WhatsApp. In his 15-year career, Aaron Berman rose to become a highly influential part of the CIA. For years, he prepared and edited the president of the United States’ daily brief, “wr[iting] and overs[eeing] intelligence analysis to enable the President and senior U.S. officials to make decisions on the most critical national security issues,” especially on “the impact of influence operations on social movements, security, and democracy,” his LinkedIn profile reads. None of this is mentioned in the Facebook video...

Berman’s case is far from unique, however. Studying Meta’s reports, as well as employment websites and databases, MintPress has found that Facebook has recruited dozens of individuals from the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), as well as many more from other agencies like the FBI and Department of Defense (DoD). These hires are primarily in highly politically sensitive sectors such as trust, security and content moderation, to the point where some might feel it becomes difficult to see where the U.S. national security state ends and Facebook begins.

In previous investigations, this author has detailed how TikTok is flooded with NATO officials, how former FBI agents abound at Twitter, and how Reddit is led by a former war planner for the NATO think tank, the Atlantic Council. But the sheer scale of infiltration of Facebook blows these away. Facebook, in short, is utterly swarming with spooks...
https://www.mintpressnews.com/meet-ex-cia-agents-deciding-facebook-content-policy/281307/


21 posted on 12/12/2022 6:01:36 PM PST by MAGAthon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ChicagoConservative27

29% are clueless dolts


25 posted on 12/12/2022 6:27:16 PM PST by SomeCallMeTim ( The best minds are not in government. If any were, business would hire them!it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ChicagoConservative27

No shit, Sherlock.


26 posted on 12/12/2022 6:56:21 PM PST by Tommy Revolts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ChicagoConservative27

Only needed to sway 0.5% of the voters to change their votes from Biden to Trump, or 1% to just not vote for Biden (like voting third party) and that would have given Trump over 270 Electoral votes. So yes, a major story like this being buried and only reported as Trump ranting like a madman about something that doesn’t exist (”this is 60 Minutes! We can’t report something that can’t be verified!”) was indeed enough to have changed the election results...far more than just 0.5% or 1% would have been effected.


27 posted on 12/12/2022 7:25:08 PM PST by Republican Wildcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson