Thanks. Trump has a clear case in most of those categories. #4 is the most ironic of all.
More corruption.
Trump didn’t argue #1 at all, which was pretty much dispositive of the case. Trump conceded there was no “callous disregard” of his constitutional rights. The 11th Circuit correctly held that, without that, the other 3 factors don’t matter.
Even so, they evaluated them. For #2, Trump showed no individual need for the return of any documents, and for #3, Trump showed no irreparable harm.
For #4, Rule 41(g) provides for the return of unlawfully seized property.
The 11th Circuit got it right.