Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Buck co-sponsors gun bill to create voluntary do-not-sell list
KDVR ^ | Dec 8, 2022 | Matt Mauro

Posted on 12/08/2022 9:27:03 AM PST by real saxophonist

Buck co-sponsors gun bill to create voluntary do-not-sell list

by: Matt Mauro

Dec 8, 2022

DENVER (KDVR) — Should the federal government create a list so people can voluntarily agree to be blocked from buying guns? That’s a bill the U.S. House of Representatives is debating — with support from a Colorado congressman.

The latest controversial gun bill in Congress is intended to cut down on suicides by allowing people who fear they could take their own lives to join a list that says they cannot legally buy a gun.

However, many Republicans argue it’s just another attack on the Second Amendment. Even so, U.S. Rep. Ken Buck, of Colorado, is a sponsor. The Republican is a strong gun rights supporter.

How the do-not-sell gun bill would work

Here’s what the bill would do.

It would require the attorney general to create what would be known as the voluntary purchase delay database.

It would also make the AG create a process so people can remove their names from the database. They would need a declaration from a mental health professional saying they are not at risk to harm themselves. Then, the AG would have 21 days to remove their name.

The House Judiciary committee approved the bill on Wednesday. But the full House would need to fast-track it and pass it before the end of this year.

Even if that happened, it would face an uphill battle in the Senate, where it would need 60 votes to pass.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government; Politics/Elections; US: Colorado
KEYWORDS: banglist; kenbuckrino
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-54 next last
This is just silly. A solution in search of a problem.

Video at source.

1 posted on 12/08/2022 9:27:03 AM PST by real saxophonist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: real saxophonist

Riiiight. It’ll be “voluntary” right up until some judge orders someone to sign up or else face contempt charges.


2 posted on 12/08/2022 9:28:16 AM PST by MeganC (There is nothing feminine about feminism. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: real saxophonist

Ken Buck is searching for relevancy....


3 posted on 12/08/2022 9:31:37 AM PST by politicket
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: real saxophonist

I’m afraid that my wife might volunteer my name to such a list...


4 posted on 12/08/2022 9:32:44 AM PST by Yo-Yo (Is the /Sarc tag really necessary? Pray for President Biden: Psalm 109:8)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: real saxophonist

And this guy votes on laws that effect all of us. WTF!!!!

AOC and Omar are the dumbest ones in Congress? Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha


5 posted on 12/08/2022 9:33:32 AM PST by qaz123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #6 Removed by Moderator

To: real saxophonist

The next thing to regulate: the number of sheets of toilet paper per crap.


7 posted on 12/08/2022 9:33:50 AM PST by immadashell (Save Innocent Lives: Ban Gun Free Zones)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: politicket

Yep. He gained notice by prosecuting one of the first ‘hate crime’ cases.


8 posted on 12/08/2022 9:33:58 AM PST by real saxophonist (Hoplophobia will never be in the DSM, because the DSM is written by hoplophobes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: real saxophonist

Of course it would *never* happen that someone who never signed up would be placed on the list by some Rat Party hack at the Department of Just Us.


9 posted on 12/08/2022 9:35:04 AM PST by Gay State Conservative (No Doubt Now: Stolen Election)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: real saxophonist

What we need most are group discussions to brainstorm the MOST moronic ideas each day. The MOST moronic each day gets some kind of prize.


10 posted on 12/08/2022 9:35:33 AM PST by stevem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: real saxophonist
That seems like a fine idea. But the list should also include being banned from going to church, being banned from posting on Twitter, Facebook, or other social media sites, and it should include checkboxes for waiving any other rights listed in the Constitution.

That way somebody could decide to ban themselves from voting, or ban themselves from writing magazine articles, or having a jury trial.

Why maybe they could include other things on the list to, like buying alcoholic beverages, or even buying high fat foods at the supermarket.

Of course anyone who puts themselves on the list would need a way to remove themselves from the list, rendering it useless.

The whole idea is ridiculous.

11 posted on 12/08/2022 9:38:18 AM PST by freeandfreezing (Do I need the sarcasm tag?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: real saxophonist

Sure looks like a camel’s nose under the tent.


12 posted on 12/08/2022 9:39:49 AM PST by Campion (Everything is a grace, everything is the direct effect of our Father's love - Little Flower)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: real saxophonist

“The Republican is a strong gun rights supporter.”

Lie.


13 posted on 12/08/2022 9:40:25 AM PST by moovova ("The NEXT election is the most important election of our lifetimes!“ LOL...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: real saxophonist

And the stoopidness continues unabated.


14 posted on 12/08/2022 9:42:06 AM PST by rktman (Destroy America from within? Check! WTH? Enlisted USN 1967 to end up with this? 😕)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #15 Removed by Moderator

To: politicket

What a crock. Volunteer to be placed on a list? Don’t buy a gun, doofus. Although I do think all liberals ought to take advantage of this so we can all see how principled they are.


16 posted on 12/08/2022 9:48:26 AM PST by DPMD ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: real saxophonist

We need a ‘Do Not Elect’ list.


17 posted on 12/08/2022 9:50:17 AM PST by Semper Vigilantis (The goal is total domination. The path is depopulation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: real saxophonist

They would need a declaration from a mental health professional saying they are not at risk to harm themselves.

guilty ‘till proven innocent. Then the AMA position is enforced.

I’ll stick with 2A. thanks.


18 posted on 12/08/2022 9:51:05 AM PST by sasquatch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #19 Removed by Moderator

To: real saxophonist

They would validate the request to get blocked just like they do mail in ballots. It will be the safest request system.


20 posted on 12/08/2022 9:53:36 AM PST by pas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-54 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson