No, dragnet2 is correct.
BTW - I have a tool that enables me to interpret the results of "elections". 
Posted on 12/03/2022 5:50:58 PM PST by Nextrush
On Gab and .win there’s a bunch of “we already knew this” talk.
True - but seeing someone get a ban arbitrarily and seeing from the outside that it’s all conservatives, and anyone who mentioned the laptop - is very different from having in hand the internal communications taking direction from government and executing it to stop speech.
So: here we get a bunch of comments about seeing judges, fixing the process, etc. That’s very nice, but while we’re busy wringing our hands about making sure we’re quite well within civility and all overt and implied legality on every point, the enemy is laughing as they threaten people for not certifying fraud, rolling on the floor as they deny any legal recourse, and stomping on all legality as they commit crimes by the thousands every election without consequence. Meanwhile we contemplate a stronger GOTV effort.
This is where we stand. We’re playing by the rule of law and the Constitution; the enemy only concerns themselves with either when they can be used to bash us. While people freak out over “the termination of all rules, regulations, and articles, even those found in the Constitution” that’s not a new horror — that’s what the DNC and its globalist owners have been doing already.
Ummm.. that’s what a certification is for.
Every single senator and representative who FAILED their duty should resign FIRST!
Think of the circular firing squad that would cause.
I've had that thought many time over these many months. It's like an equation that has a single solution, regardless of how many times you look at it.
Trump is right.
He left out the rino party from the conspirators, facilitators and look the other wayers list.
Trump calls restitution line and I’ll be by his side.
The crooks in ‘our’ great country will find out just how minority they are.
Well stated.
The framers of the Constitution designed stability, certainty, and continuity into the POTUS selection process, going so far as to give ordinary citizens no role to play.
The wildcard, though, has always been the sitting VPOTUS. Nobody has the power to force VPOUTUS to certify any given state’s Electoral College vote tally if the VPOTUS smells a rat and demands accountability.
Pence smelled a rat. You know he did! But he had no spine or fortitude and as a result missed his opportunity to render to the country what it needed most, when it needed it most. He just didn’t have it in him.
Hey listen, Jan 6 was not the day of the ordinary citizen to take appropriate action. It was the day for our Representatives in high office to saddle up and take action like men. They failed that test, that quadrennial process ended, and another one, the one we’re now in, started.
It stopped a long time ago, when the United States Supreme Court raised a figurative water-tight "wall" to separate promotion of church functionality from that of supposedly "neutral" (but then really agnosticalyy unchristian) governmental operations, by a narrow--not overwhelming--margin in the Everson vs Board of Education (1947) decision.
A basis for that cancerous political disease did not exist in any previous history of the Court's operations, despite Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr's ruling that from his time henceforth the Court's decisions would be based on "case law" (precedence) rather than "natural (Bible-morality) law" (that starts from first principles and develops from there).
Our Declaration of Independence and Constitution have never recovered from the lethal wounds and accompanying spiritual cancer that the wholly unwarranted comprehensive USSC "separation" decision delivered to these documents, and freed atheistic perpetrators to take down a God-fearing Republic.
Everson v. Board of Education (click here)
Establishment ClauseNow, remember that every Justice on the Everson Court was appointed by a Progressive-minded President, and determinedly so by a President that wanted to pack the Court with men who would sustain his socialist programs.
(excerpt)
In Everson v. Board of Education, 330 U.S. 1 (1947), the Supreme Court ruled as constitutional a New Jersey statute allocating taxpayer funds to bus children to religious schools — because it did not breach the “wall of separation” between church and state — and held that the establishment clause of the First Amendment applied to state and local governments as well as to the federal government.
Despite the Court’s narrow 5-4 decision, the mix of separationist reasoning and accommodationist outcome has made the case a popular precedent for liberals as well as conservatives. The commonly used phrase “separation of church and state” is derived from the “wall” metaphor in this case; the Court in turn borrowed it from Roger Williams and Thomas Jefferson.
=======
(Click on the link above to read more of this.)
The result of having such kind of Justices enthroned throughout this branch of government is that we have elected people to office in the other two branches whose personal preferences has been pushing the concepts of a Biblical God, His Son the King of all creation, and His motivating Spirit far enough away from the operation of the various governments that they can satisfy their own selfish motives, by pandering to the depraved instincts of the godless elements of the population, thus yielding its control to the god of this world and his human lust- and drug-ridden slaves.
And now, the curtain on this trend has been drawn back. To even the most insensitive human, the effects are now not merely visible, but also quite tangibly impacting the now-powerless citizen's freedoms without judicial, legislative, or executive relief.
The selection system is broken, and apparently cannot be fixed that it be restored to its use as originally intended.
No, dragnet2 is correct.
BTW - I have a tool that enables me to interpret the results of "elections".
“He is spending way too much time rehashing this stuff. He should be spending his money on ensuring the states’ process are clean. But it’s easier (and less expensive) to bitch about it.”
I’m so sick of you anti-Trumpers. You are part of the problem.
“The corrupt, illegal voting procedures WERE challenged before the election ... the courts in which the challenges were raised ignored or rejected the challenges.
Every.
Single.
Time.
According to our corrupt courts, nobody has standing to challenge illegal election procedures before the election, because the election hasn’t happened yet and nobody has been harmed.
According to our corrupt courts, nobody has standing to challenge illegal election procedures after the election, because the election has already occurred and the point is moot.”
BINGO. Excellent summation. To Vermont LT, what you say here will not sink in, intentionally will not sink in.
Xactly!
Take a peek outside your bubble and you will see that the left already executes this power. One or two more election cycles and we will be under one party rule. I promise, you won't like that. I further promise it will be wholly unConstitutional.
“A Massive Fraud of this type and magnitude allows for the termination of all rules, regulations and articles, even those found in the Constitution.”
Translate this for the dense among us.
Why do you change the subject? You guys cannot focus.
I think a larger point about those complaining about a supposed suspension of the Constitution is that, in effect, the Democrats by their massive cheating in 2020 and 2022 have already suspended the Constitution for all practical purposes.
Further as DJT says “an unprecedented fraud requires an unprecedented response.” How else to end this circus, except to end it?
It cannot be ended by voting, by plausible Congressional act, by any judicial ruling. We know this because all three of those remedies have been attempted, tried and failed.
So for those that laugh, what workable solution can be proposed, accepted, put into practice, and achieved before the 2024 election?
Failing that, Conservatives, Republicans and Independents will go to the polls in 2024 to cast their votes in a system where only the number of ballots count, not the number of votes. And so a Democrat outcome can be safely predicted, even from this remove in time.
Ok, how many threads on this subject will be posted? 5,10,15 25?
Agree.
THAT is not the issue. Fraud cancels everything according to the law.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.