He didn’t say that or allude to it; but he puts the blame where it lies. Re-read what he posted.
Upon closely reading the text, you could reasonably interpret it either way: That he was calling for the termination of the Constitution, or that the fraud caused the termination of the Constitution.
I’m very uncomfortable with ANY POSSIBILITY of the first interpretation. He should have made it VERY CLEAR he was not calling for the termination of the Constitution, and he should have done it in the initial ‘tweet’.
I grow increasingly uncomfortable with this man as a candidate for re-election.... and I was one of his earliest and most strident supporters.