Upon closely reading the text, you could reasonably interpret it either way: That he was calling for the termination of the Constitution, or that the fraud caused the termination of the Constitution.
I’m very uncomfortable with ANY POSSIBILITY of the first interpretation. He should have made it VERY CLEAR he was not calling for the termination of the Constitution, and he should have done it in the initial ‘tweet’.
I grow increasingly uncomfortable with this man as a candidate for re-election.... and I was one of his earliest and most strident supporters.
Laz. You always been a resistor. ❤
I grow increasingly uncomfortable with this man as a candidate for re-election....
We know.
🙃
You need to get back to supporting insider professional government politicians....Because that’s all ya got without Trump.