Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

If this isn’t a violation of the Constitution’s First Amendment, what is?
Twitter ^ | 7:24 PM · Dec 2, 2022 | Elon Musk

Posted on 12/03/2022 9:08:39 AM PST by E. Pluribus Unum


(Excerpt) Read more at twitter.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Front Page News; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: butinflation; elonmusk; firstamendment; freespeech; musk; privatecompany; truthsocial; twitter
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-127 next last
To: E. Pluribus Unum

It’s NOT a violation of the First Amendment.
The first amendment is violated when “The Government” infringes on speech.
President Trump was in office when this request was made.
Biden was a private citizen.

Please learn more about the 1stamendment.


21 posted on 12/03/2022 9:32:57 AM PST by teofila
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

I don’t know.
I don’t know.
I don’t know.


22 posted on 12/03/2022 9:35:00 AM PST by Mathews (I have faith Malachi is right!!! Any day now...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: teofila

Wrong. Deep state “government” actors were involved and they need to be put on trial for subverting the constitution.


23 posted on 12/03/2022 9:35:23 AM PST by imabadboy99
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: newzjunkey

think they stopped once in office?


24 posted on 12/03/2022 9:37:17 AM PST by joshua c (to disrupt the system, we must disrupt our lives, cut the cable tv)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Izzatso

“Elon banned Kanye, but that’s beside the point.”


Elon Musk
@elonmusk
Replying to
@TheeAleexJ
and
@kanyewest
I tried my best. Despite that, he again violated our rule against incitement to violence. Account will be suspended.
12:04 AM · Dec 2, 2022


25 posted on 12/03/2022 9:42:44 AM PST by TexasGator (!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: newzjunkey

File under “dirty tricks”


26 posted on 12/03/2022 9:47:48 AM PST by databoss
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Izzatso
Elon banned Kanye, but that’s beside the point.

But not at the instigation of the government. Elon has pretty broad tolerance, but any decent organization has a right to firmly and unequivocally repudiate Nazism, an unalloyed and definite evil. He also bans child porn. I have absolutely no qualms about banning either one.

27 posted on 12/03/2022 9:47:58 AM PST by Lonesome in Massachussets (Forsan et haec olim meminisse iuvabit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Scalia would say no based on the text of the Constitution.


28 posted on 12/03/2022 9:51:25 AM PST by PatriotarchyQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BookmanTheJanitor

“W”...what are Republicans going to do about it?

Nothing, or dirt on them will come out too.


29 posted on 12/03/2022 9:51:59 AM PST by SaxxonWoods (The only way to secure your own future is to create it yourself.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

I think Elon is referring to the FBI asking that content be suppressed. Let’s wait until all the files given Talibbi are put out.


30 posted on 12/03/2022 9:54:29 AM PST by shadowlands1960 (We live in a world of intolerance masked as tolerance. RUSH LIMBAUGH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Lonesome in Massachussets

Oh, I understand that and agree. I’m just chuckling at all the people who were praising Musk’s commitment to ‘free speech’ a couple weeks ago in regards to Kanye when it actually had nothing to do with 1A.


31 posted on 12/03/2022 9:59:25 AM PST by Izzatso
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

I don’t want folks to get all excited here, but there’s no first ammendment violation here. A presidential campaign (not yet elected, ergo not part of the government) asked for favors from Twitter to shape the news. Twitter gleefully complied. Has been happening since the advent of news.

There is no law against this, even if there should be. The Bill of Rights is not a generic “things I like are legal, things I don’t like are illegal” catchall.

The right knew all of this was happening, the left knew all of this was happening, but the left is losing it’s mind right now because they firmly believed they could get away with it forever. Same with the Hillary crime coverups.

Musk shattered that mirage, just like Trump shattered the Hillary is inevitable mirage. Credit to both of them for using their privileged stations in life to pick these necessary fights that normies like us couldn’t. The reaction from the establishment is going to be at least as vicious as it was against Trump.


32 posted on 12/03/2022 9:59:46 AM PST by jz638
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

First amendment says “Congress shall make no law ... abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press;...”

Did Congress make any laws about Twitter, Hunter Biden, etc.?


33 posted on 12/03/2022 10:03:59 AM PST by FarCenter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: newzjunkey
Dorsey's Twitter engaged in 'in-kind campaign contribution' to the Bai Din campaign as well as obstruction of justice and violation of various news outlets First Amendment rights and on and on..

Electioneering by Twitter at the behest of the RATS. So what else is new?

I am MORE interested in Twitter's BANNING FORMER PRESIDENT TRUMP from the platform. To me, this is MORE egregious and inexplicable..

Declare Twitter a COMMON CARRIER ALREADY, DAMNIT! It has risen to that level as a means of real-time mass communication!

34 posted on 12/03/2022 10:12:46 AM PST by CivilWarBrewing (Get off my back for my usage of CAPS, especially you snowflake males! MAN UP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: brownsfan

Constitution? Dead white slave owners wrote it, so it can’t be good.


35 posted on 12/03/2022 10:15:54 AM PST by Eleutheria5 (Free country? Good morning, Rip. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

I keep resisting the urge to subscribe to Taibbi’s Substack — him being a raging lefty and all — but it’s getting harder these days and I’m succumbing to random thoughts of following an intelligent being’s thoughts for once…


36 posted on 12/03/2022 10:15:59 AM PST by Magnatron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Everyone already knows nothing will happen to any democrat politician or any democrat voter.

When peaceful revolution is made impossible, violent revolution is required.


37 posted on 12/03/2022 10:16:22 AM PST by joma89 (Buy weapons and ammo, folks, and have the will to use them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

These Tweets are interesting to read. I am waiting for the condensed list of Who Requested: Who Facilitated: Final Decision Maker: Who Was Harmed.


38 posted on 12/03/2022 10:21:01 AM PST by Savage Rider
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: joma89

Before the violent revolution, there was the logistical underground against Mercantilism, which was what the revolution was all about. Smuggling goods from outside the British Empire, growing grapes from the great French and Spanish wine regions, etc. Set up the logistical underground first, and don’t talk about it on Freep or any other internet resource. If by the time that’s set up, a violent revolution is still inevitable, well, don’t let me stop you, but keep talk of it under the radar.


39 posted on 12/03/2022 10:21:31 AM PST by Eleutheria5 (Free country? Good morning, Rip. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
The Biden/DNC outfit colluded with Twitter to violate the first Amendment rights of several outlets/individuals. Not to mention in kind contribution to the Biden campaign. Nasty ppl. As usual Trump was right.
40 posted on 12/03/2022 10:21:44 AM PST by hotsteppa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-127 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson