Posted on 12/03/2022 9:08:39 AM PST by E. Pluribus Unum
(Excerpt) Read more at twitter.com ...
That's what the Democrats did to people on Twitter.
-PJ
The DNC are not government officials.
The government officials at the time were Trump's.
Congress is "government" too, BTW.
I never said the DNC, I said the DNC were a front for Democrats in Congress. The Democrats knew enough to hide themselves behind the DNC (Marc Elias).
-PJ
Where in the hell did that right come from?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Let's just parse this a little bit.
Democrats (the federal government) abridged the right of people to speak. Period. (it doesn't matter if it was Twitter, a soapbox or talk radio)
Where in the hell did that right come from?
The First Amendment.
We have the right to vote, not to Tweet.
You are free to post on Twitter, and they can censor you if they wish....but the government cannot.
WRONG!
The permanent overpaid, unelected bureaucRATs are not Republicans.
And if there are a few, you can count on the fact that they're going to be damn quiet about it.
Fox News Digital also learned that, according to Chan's testimony, the FBI regularly sends social media companies lists of internet URLs and social media accounts that should be taken down because they are "disinformation" from "malign foreign influence operations." The FBI then inquires whether the platforms have taken down the content. On many occasions, the platforms take down the accounts flagged by the FBI.
FBI met weekly with Big Tech ahead of the 2020 election, agent testifies
And there's also this.
The FBI were watching Guiliani's account and knew the Hunter Biden story was going to break so Big Tech was told to label it "misinformation/disinformation".
Miranda Devine: Twitter Files left out this 'crucial' element-author of the censored NY Post article
That’s your problem, right there.
Political parties are private organizations.
Was Zuckerberg lying when he said the FBI met with FB or when he said they didn’t mention Hunter or the laptop?
I don't care what the kid said. I care what FBI Supervisory Special Agent Elvis Chan testified.....under oath.
Btw, from the article: Zuckerberg said he could not recall if the FBI specifically flagged the Hunter Biden laptop story as Russian disinformation, but said that the story "basically fit the pattern" that the FBI had identified.
Based on what Devine said, Elvis didn't mention Hunter or the laptop either.
No government entity has any business to meet weekly with Big Tech and order them to remove content. Period.
Read later.
I don't have a problem. In fact I don't even have a problem calling the democRATs what they really are...communists. The communists run everything, including half the elected Republicans (RINOs).
They "own" the print media, the broadcast media, the entertainment media, the education systems, the bureaucracies at all levels of government, all the "woke" industries that have recently outed themselves. (the means of production)
The communists actually won the "Cold War" back in the 60s and many casual observers are just now figuring that out. That's when Soviet agents infiltrated US society and all these "movements" miraculously and spontaneously began to spring erupt and thrive. Now the hippies and faggots are running and ruining the USA....with, I might add, a lot of help from the ChiComs.
And yeah, all of those bad actors I just mentioned above, if they don't outright "self-identify" as communists, or socialists......they will as democRATs.
From the NY Post: When Rogan asked Zuckerberg if the FBI “specifically” said the social media giant should “be on guard about that story,” the tech titan said he couldn’t recall.
“No, I don’t remember if it was that specifically, but it basically fit the pattern,” he said.
She claims to have seen a sworn statement by Roth that he was told there was a rumor the dump was about Biden.
There's no link to the statement anywhere that I can find.
He then came out with an unambiguous statement:
The FBI interfered in an election. 51 CIA operatives lent their voices to the lie that the laptop was “Russian disinformation”. That’s government interference. They’ve gotten away with this kind of corruption since 2016. Do you support the truth, government is corrupt, or are you going to continue to argue in support of the corruption. Your choice.
Of course not. But MSN admits it exists.
Twitter’s then-head of Site Integrity Yoel Roth has stated in a sworn declaration that he was told during those meetings to expect “hack-and-leak operations” by state actors involving Hunter Biden.
What’s missing from the Twitter files: The truth about the FBI
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.