I agree the media treated the Brooks case differently but his motive was never determined and he never attempted to use his act as a terrorist platform. Despite being given weeks of live TV coverage without an attorney and being allowed to say anything he pleased on live air. There was no evidence he attempted to choose victims by race and anyone in his way was hit.
The Buffalo idiot live streamed the shooting with obvious messages of hate and terror on his rifle that he wanted the world to see/repeat. He even apologized to a white man in the store while shooting blacks near him several times. Plus a manifesto full of personal details that explained the motive. This was a very clear case and almost a copy of the NZ idiot.
Re: 15 - Thanks for bringing that up. There was a middle age white male on the floor who the shooter passed his muzzle over and shot nearby blacks. The shooter is trash and thankfully will never be free again.
Brooks clearly targeted White people. The fact that there weren’t any non-Whites in significant numbers in his way merely shows how he targeted it.
It’s naive nonsense to believe that he did it because um...his credit card interest was too high?
Please.