Please tall us how the second amendment has deterred the growth of the destructive efforts?
I’ve seen no blood, no bodies
Please tall us how the second amendment has deterred the growth of the destructive efforts?
I’ve seen no blood, no bodies
************************************************************
...well Bert, lol....., hmmmmm......I don’t see the words “growth” or “destructive efforts” in my post or even any “allusion” to them directly, obliquely or otherwise.
Neither do I see the words blood or bodies or any allusion to them either.
So, sorry, I really don’t understand your questions.
That said, if you are really interested in what I meant by employing the term “second amendment” in the context of the subject article, I’ll tell you. The article in question avered to HOW the Chinese Communists, cousins of our Democratic Party communists, tend to mow down their unarmed countrymen when they get a chance with tanks being one method they employ (think 10,000 citizens at Tiananmen Sq). My point was/is that I believe our Dems would do the same thing............if they could.
Now, you may not agree with my point. If so, no problem. Everyone’s entitled to their opinion, lol, thanks to the second amendment upholding the FIRST.