No. (National Review weighs in)

National Review ^ | 11/15/2022 | Editors

[DesertRhino]

Bullcrap. 2020 was a stolen election. There is no moving on from that. He must get the term he was given by America. It is the only way of justice.

[Tom in SFCA]

Pretty much every sentence of this is a lie.

[Jane Long]

😂

[ocrp1982]

RINO Review has put out its two cents worth that no one has cared about for years. Their irrelevance is obvious but, apparently, the RINO Bush wing of the party are buying enough of their nonsense to keep them in business.

[Fiji Hill]

The episode ended with Trump, in a grotesque abuse of his powers, trying to bully Vice President Pence into unilaterally delaying or changing the count of electoral votes on January 6 and with an inflamed pro-Trump mob storming the Capitol while the president gave no indication that he particularly minded.

So they buy into the J6 lie, ignoring the fact that Trump called for his supporters to remain peaceful and offered Nancy Pelosi additional security, which she turned down.

[unclebankster]

National Review is full of girly boys.

Girly boys can’t make America great again.

What good are these conservative girly boys again?

[Huskrrrr]

I’d rather read Mother Jones. I hate these elitist pukes.

[BatGuano]

Eat it, NR. On his worst day, Donald J Trump was and is far better than the POS in the white hut, Joe Biteme.

FJB, always, FJb!

[toddausauras]

NRO refuses to “get” the big picture. Like all anti-Trumpers.

[AnotherUnixGeek]

To his credit, Trump killed off the Clinton dynasty in 2016, nominated and got confirmed three constitutionalist justices, reformed taxes, pushed deregulation, got control of the border, significantly degraded ISIS in Syria and Iraq, and cinched normalization deals between Israel and the Gulf states

I'm trying to think of another president during my lifetime with a comparable record of accomplishment, and I can't. And NR is using this as an argument against Trump?

[Olog-hai]

Might as well make it two yeses (sic). Eunice Gayson as Sylvia Trench.

[GOPJ]

Did you notice its ‘group written’ by the ‘editors’? Showing a little backbone would have been different.

Trump’s got my vote so to hell with ‘the editors’...

[unclebankster]

“So they buy into the J6 lie, ignoring the fact that Trump called for his supporters to remain peaceful and offered Nancy Pelosi additional security, which she turned down.”

National Review is full of the same people that are running our country into a globalist toilet.
They are proponents of make America an irrelevant “woke import powerhouse” economically.

Older conservatives ditched these warmongering clowns years ago, their only hope for relevancy is Young College Republicans- Which is a young naive group of people, so NR most likely isn’t going away.

[Lod881019]

Does anybody read NRO anymore they have like 6 subscribers now and their old readers all pretty much just read the Lincoln Project now

[No.6]

>Looks like the Noers are the new Never Trumpers.

The *new* Never Trumpers? This was the group that dedicated a whole issue to “Against Trump.” They haven’t changed.

[Bloodandgravy]

The aristocrats have spoken.

[jdsteel]

I’m agnostic about Trump as the nominee, and am willing to see what Republican primary voters decide.

I’m sick and tired of the never-Trumpers acting as if they aren’t.

[Bob434]

lol- send that to NR-

[Major Matt Mason]

As long as the GOP is weak and useless (and likely corrupt), Trump will remain relevant. I don't see how he wins in 2024 if he wasn't allowed to win in 2020, but I don't have a problem with him running.

[dragonblustar]

Psy-ops from the RINOs. Gaslighting their way to save the GOP from MAGA people.