[TomGuy]

Democrats cheat.

That 'excuse' doesn't work in states where the Republican vote split badly. In GA, for example, the R Gov won by 8 or so points, but the R Senate candidate is struggling in a run-off, meaning he apparently got +0 benefit.

Before broadly painting the races the Republican lost as being stolen, those individual races have to be examined.

[hopefullamerican]

Nown now...we can’t have common sense intruding into this discussion...”individual races have to be examined.”. The knee jerk reaction that everything is fraud is wearing thin. Some candidates just plain lost because the voters didn’t like them or their message...that’s politics.

A couple of candidates I supported lost. And folks frankly said they weren’t happy with their positions or the positions the party they were affiliated with.

[riverdawg]

“Before broadly painting the races the Republican lost as being stolen, those individual races have to be examined.”

I made the same point, specifically about the GA election outcomes, to no avail here. Kemp received 200,000 more votes than Walker did, and Abrams received 130,000 fewer votes than Warnock did. There were about 150,000 fewer ballots cast in the Senate race than in the race for governor. So, some Kemp voters didn’t vote in the Senate election and some Kemp voters voted for Warnock or “others.”