Michelle Swinik
Posted on 11/13/2022 7:05:03 PM PST by SeekAndFind
Michelle Swinik
Michele Swinick was an election judge in Maricopa County on election day last week. Following the election Michele stepped forward to discuss what she experienced in Maricopa County on Election Day.
Michele worked at a center in a heavily Republican district. According to Michele, the tabulators worked perfectly well the night before the election. Then on Election Day they quit working. Only 1 in 10 ballots were accepted through the tabulators. The officials were told to put the defective ballots into a different section called “Door 3.”
Michele believes this was all planned. The election officials knew that republicans were going to come out in force on election day as they did in the primary. This was a planned operation.
UncoverDC reported:
Election judge Michele Swinick has come forward to report what she experienced in Maricopa County on Election Day. She worked Election Day as a judge at the Islamic Voting Center in Scottsdale, AZ. She reports that the center is heavily Republican, with “no party” designated voters as the second most populous demographic, followed by very few democrat voters, evidenced by the fact that she checked in very few of them on Election Day. She reports she spent the entire day checking in voters.
Swinick says that the tabulators all worked “perfectly” during the test the night before the election. The problem with scanning began immediately with the first ballots. Voters scanned their ballots between 4 and 12 times with very minimal success. Poll workers estimated about 1 in 10 ballots were being read for the first three hours of voting.
Voters were given options to either spoil their ballots and try again or drop them into a different section called “Door 3.” As per Swinick, their inspector had to empty the ballots from “Door 3” three times throughout the early afternoon because of the volume of ballots. Typically, ballots aren’t supposed to be removed from that box until polls close, but they made an exception because the box was jamming and became too full.
Swinick reports that the technician came to the center between 3:30 pm and 4:00 pm MT and rebooted the machines. After this, there were no further issues with ballots being run through tabulators. She reported that one of the poll workers told her, “Everything is now going smoothly with the tabulators.”
Per Swinick’s inspector, an offsite supervisor had advised “Because of the situation” to put all “door 3” ballots that had not been scanned through a tabulator into a separate black bag and to label them “misreads.” As a judge, Michele told UncoverDC that she personally signed the sticker placed over the bag’s zipper, and then these bags were sent to the tabulation center to be counted. Michele informed us that the normal process for a ballot that is “unread” is for poll workers to run the ballots through the tabulators one more time before sending them to the center. As per Swinick, this was not done.
The County had set up a website to give voters the ability to check that their vote was counted. The problem is Michele has proven that the website isn’t correct and seems to be using a voter’s “check in” as evidence their vote was tabulated rather than the actual tabulation of the vote. Michele offered her first-hand proof of this.
“My roommate ran his ballot through the tabulators 15 times as one of the 1st voters at the Islamic Center. It did not read the ballot. He was forced to drop it in door #3.
About an hour after I arrived home at 9 pm MT, my roommate checked the website to see if his vote had been counted. The website reported it was. It is mathematically impossible for his vote to have been counted by then since only an hour before, I left the center, and the ballots had not been taken from the center to the meeting point where the ballots are hand exchanged to another transport team, which takes them to the tabulation center. For his ballot to have been counted, it would have also needed to be sorted and hand-counted by a team at that center and reported into the website —all within that hour.
Read the rest here.
Is there no procedure in place for reporting malfunctioning equipment or improper action by poll workers to an authority??
Biden got millions of votes on “ballots”.
On the vast majority of those same ballots the “Democratic voter” did not vote for anyone down the ballot. If they had the Democrats would have swept countless races in 2020. Since then they have figured out how to do the same thing in this election cycle. This happened in states that don’t have solid voter ID laws. That’s why things were fair in states like Texas (except Harris County) and Florida.
.
Yes, this will be accepted like a Peaceful Trump rally.
Does not meet narrative standards,
.
GP - look, we found a person that can make conservatives look crazy.
BREAKING: We have the Packets! Release the Kraken!
I have been voting in Salado, Texas for over 20 years. Our machines do not fail. Our machines are not Dominion Machines.
I present a valid ID with a photograph of myself. They look at a list of valid voters and cross off my name and give me a ballot. I vote. My area is mostly white but I assure you the people of color get the exact same service as my Mexican wife as do blacks.
I trust my voting district. However, my ballot is read by a machine and then tabulated. I would much rather prefer a paper ballot tabulated by humans from all parties observing. In WWII in a time of great chaos we used paper ballots read by people and not machines. We knew who was the president elect the next day. It worked then. What we have today is not working and trust in the ballot is no more.
We must go back to what worked in the past.
The real question is when a ballot is sent for “adjudication” is whom adjudicates the adjudicators.
BTTT!!!
This is how their steal is in....for at least TWO elections, now.
Looks like each of the cheater states has their own ‘system’.
The authority works for the Deep State.
Great question.
Dear Moderator,
I accidentally mistyped Arizona in the title.
I would appreciate your correcting the typo.
My apologies.
Bkmk.
Whatever. She cheated.
America no longer believes or operates on a “one man one vote” system. The individual and his rights are not the center of the system.
We operate on a ballot system, centered around groups, blocs and areas. Its a form of state-administered group-identity politics.
The can do whatever they want now to steal elections. This is as close to a whimper as they will ever get.
Do they have this?
There is no such thing as a Senator Hobbs. She is NOT running for Senate.
They aren’t even trying to hide it this go around.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.