the weasel surgeons will likely argue in court that it is the responsibility of the ‘transtioner’ to know that they are gettign into by researching the issue thoroughly before dicing on surgery
If I'm wrong one of FRs lawyers will correct me but I think the age of consent for medical procedures is 15. In this case the transition began at 13. The double double mastectomy at 15, they'll probably argue that. In fact it's probably the argument they'll make. But the treatment began at 13, in my mind that's the age of the decision which I'm sure his side will argue. The defense wouldn't want me on the jury.
There have been other, even adult, ‘transitioners’ who have said that they were NEVER fully informed of the side effects and health issues they would encounter after these procedures; and when they did suffer them, they couldn’t get help.