Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Abortion rights sweep every ballot referendum (CA, KY, MI, MT, VT)
The New York Times ^ | November 9, 2022

Posted on 11/09/2022 3:52:02 AM PST by Trump20162020

California, Michigan and Vermont voters vote to protect abortion; Kentucky votes 'no' on "no right to an abortion" and Montana votes down Born-Alive Infants Regulation.

(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...


TOPICS: Politics/Elections; US: California; US: Kentucky; US: Missouri; US: Montana; US: Vermont
KEYWORDS: 2022; 2022election; 2timothy3verses1to7; abortion; bornaliveinfantreg; breedingcolonies; california; daniel12verse10; gileadlivesonfr; juststfu; religiousaholes; romans1verses18to22
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-85 last
To: trustverify0128

Absolutely men on the whole support Abortion. It was a mistake to make this a women’s issue as it gives cover for the men...and they like it that way. It really does come down to both sexes seeking sexual relations without the risk of a pregnancy going full term. Same goes for those living together rather than getting married. They’re really just playing house without the commitment so when somebody better comes along they’re free to fly the coop without the expense and headaches of a divorce.


81 posted on 11/09/2022 8:27:26 AM PST by caww (O death, when you seized my Lord, you lost your grip on me......Augustine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: Trumpisourlastchance

No I wouldn’t call it that - people are free to choose and these women choose to murder their babies.


82 posted on 11/09/2022 8:29:31 AM PST by caww (O death, when you seized my Lord, you lost your grip on me......Augustine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: Trump20162020

Dare I say that in response to such laws (abortion up to birth) it is acceptable to save the lives of these infants by any means necessary? No one can argue that we are debating about “clumps of cells” or “the life of the mother” or “fetus not compatible with life” or “rape” or “incest”. Their mask is off. They are clear in their intent. KILLING BABIES FOR NO REASON EXCEPT THEY DON’T WANT IT.

What we have is the right for serial murder to be given the protection of law. How would such murders of a 6 year old be met? Would they deserve such protection? No.


83 posted on 11/09/2022 9:27:20 AM PST by lastchance (Credo.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: C19fan

I think fear mongering by abortion supporters and badly worded referendums are partially to blame.


84 posted on 11/09/2022 9:28:29 AM PST by lastchance (Credo.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: gleeaikin
What family man struggling to earn enough to support the family even with his wife working full or part time wants to face the possibility of an unplanned pregnancy, especial with the current inflation issues?

Not really much of a "family man" if he's perfectly fine killing his own kids just because they're inconvenient..
85 posted on 11/09/2022 7:03:54 PM PST by Svartalfiar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-85 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson