Posted on 11/07/2022 1:36:08 PM PST by ChicagoConservative27
I agree… that 0.1% “lead” for Oz will be wiped away in a single Philly precinct.
Mark Halperin just said on Newsmax that he has talked to many republicans who are clairvoyant I guess and none say Dr Oz will win the PA senate ran. So if it turns out to be true. The voters in PA have to be total complete idiots to send that lardass socialist Fetterman to the senate. He’s dumber than rocks and a walking heart-attack waiting to happen. No way a sane person could elect that idiot for dog catcher. Or, more likely, A Fetterman win means the electing was stolen by way of mail in ballots.
Mark Halperin just said on Newsmax that he has talked to many republicans who are clairvoyant I guess and none say Dr Oz will win the PA senate ran. So if it turns out to be true. The voters in PA have to be total complete idiots to send that lardass socialist Fetterman to the senate. He’s dumber than rocks and a walking heart-attack waiting to happen. No way a sane person could elect that idiot for dog catcher. More likely, if the moron Fetterman wins mail-in ballots will be the reason. PA is very good at cheating.
You would think the homeless and mentally I’ll would vote Republican. Homeless see the failure of economic policies and the crooked welfare system. The mentally I’ll would not vote for democrats because the voices they here probably sound like the demonic democrats. Just a thought.
The Seattle homeless do not vote.
That is why their “votes” have to be manufactured at the precinct where they are registered—which is King County Courthouse.
“I want to be optimistic - but so much fraud in Kings County.”
There in lies the problem. They always seem to find boxes of uncounted votes.
Dino Rossi enters the chat.
Where did you come up wit that number? I hope you’re right!
Your state, Washington, has an interesting law that make cheating very favorable. Specifically, if the election is within a small %age (I do not know the exact number but like .5%), then it is an automatic recount. If, after the recount, it is still within a certain %age, then it is recounted again, automatically. After the second recount the results are final and no further requests for recounts will be accepted.
Gregoire lost the election by a few thousand votes resulting in an automatic recount, with some lost ballots retrieved.
Gregoire lost the recount but was within margin requiring an automatic recount and more lost ballots retrieved. Gregoire won with no recounts possible.
very handy.
Ha ha, I remember that, and I wanted to puke.The so called year of the woman.
This is great news.
But I have a dream……
I remember it well. After Rossi won twice with a diminishing number of votes each time the Demoncrats demanded a hand recount. I don’t remember the vote total after the machine recounts but the last one was vey close. I wrote down my prediction after the last recount, Gregoire winning by 192 votes. The final tally had her winning by 129.
Yep, same thing if Zeldin wins the Gov race in NY, it would mean lights out for the Dems everywhere.
That would be amazing.
“Where did you come up wit that number? I hope you’re right!”
To summarize I take the average polling number of the incumbent (in Murray’s case 46%) and assume the undecided mainly break for the challenger. Then I go back to the previous election (2016) that Murray won taking the total vote plus 10% more turnout and take a percentage (3%) to project the margin of victory for Tiffany. Now this formula works about 7 times out of 10 and it does not account for fraud. Finally if the polling data is off then toss my formula in the shitter. lol
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.