Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ChicagoConservative27

It used to be said that if a Senate incumbent wasn’t at 50%, they were going to lose, but I haven’t heard that in about 15 years. Is tat still the case?


9 posted on 11/06/2022 2:55:24 PM PST by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: nickcarraway
It used to be said that if a Senate incumbent wasn’t at 50%, they were going to lose, but I haven’t heard that in about 15 years. Is tat still the case?

I think so.

14 posted on 11/06/2022 3:07:01 PM PST by NeoCaveman (Oil, it's organic and all natural)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway

that’s always the case with any incumbent, but you are right that for some reason you don’t hear it much more.


15 posted on 11/06/2022 3:12:09 PM PST by TexasFreeper2009
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway

That’s never really been the case. More like if they are 46% or less, assuming their opponent isn’t like at 35% or something. 48-49 is way too close to 50%. Most undecideds could break against them and they could still win.


36 posted on 11/06/2022 8:14:05 PM PST by Republican Wildcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson