Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ConservativeInPA

All lists of this type, will depend on the criteria used to evaluate these locations. All of us have various individual criteria we would use, to decide if we want to relocate at retirement.


3 posted on 11/01/2022 9:52:56 AM PDT by Dilbert San Diego
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Dilbert San Diego

it also depends on whether those locales paid to be added to the list. Call me a cynic, but i can’t see PA being on this list at all. I would say places that have lower taxes and less government interference would be higher. ESPECIALLY if you are retiring and need to shepherd your funds.


8 posted on 11/01/2022 9:55:15 AM PDT by NicoDon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Dilbert San Diego

Pennsylvania has a flat (and low) state income tax rate, and doesn’t tax retirement account distributions or pensions. That’s the only reason these places are on this list.


18 posted on 11/01/2022 10:08:19 AM PDT by Alberta's Child ("It's midnight in Manhattan. This is no time to get cute; it's a mad dog's promenade.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Dilbert San Diego

You bet it does. Unless the detailed criteria are revealed, this should be ignored. From this list, Reading, PA is a crap house for quality of life. Another questionable place on this list is Lancaster, PA. That place has problems with drugs, the Amish surrounding the area notwithstanding. (Even the Amish are having problems.)


58 posted on 11/01/2022 11:23:20 AM PDT by Smber (The smallest minority is the individual. Get the government off my back.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson