Rumors Are Swirling That Pelosi Is REFUSING To Give Up Security Footgage

https://welovetrump.com ^ | October 31, 2022 | by Anthony T

[teeman8r]

if tax payers are funding that security system... then we have a right to view it.

[Qwapisking]

In my best msnbc news anchor voice...”WHAT are they hiding?”

[rktman]

And the SFPD body cams footage? No? Depepe’s records of interfaces with the SFPD? Crickets.......................

[cranked]

How about the police body cam footages and the audio for the entire phone call(s)?

Nothing to hide.
Move along folks.

[A_Former_Democrat]

Yeah, the public can’t see Paulie Pooper hand in hand with his dysfunctional illegal alien loveboi entering his Pacific Heights homo luvnest

[BerryDingle]

Publicity hoax just like J6. In fact, remarkable similarities.

[Savage Beast]

Nancy’s smart. She’s efficient. And she’s probably got lots of dirt on everybody. That’s what Democrats do.

[ClearCase_guy]

“It’s not the crime. It’s the cover-up.”

[Chad C. Mulligan]

Federal charges to be filed. Sundance (CTH) points out that this will enable DOJ to keep everything secret for years.

[Red Badger]

[Carl Vehse]

Calling Mr. Waterboard...

[silverleaf]

This can never go to trial.
This guy will be “ Epsteined” or deported or both

[Liz]

Scandal-Ridden San Francisco FBI Field Office Involved in Pelosi Investigation
American Greatness ^ | 31 Oct, 2022 | Julie Kelly
Posted on 11/1/2022, 8:44:48 AM by MtnClimber

Given the highly partisan nature of the FBI, and the San Francisco field office in particular, there is no reason to believe FBI brass will do anything more than run cover for the Pelosis.

No one should accept at face value the strange account of what happened to Paul Pelosi, husband of House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.), at their California home last week.

Plenty of factors—a wholly dishonest news media, unsubstantiated claims the attacker was a foiled assassin who planned to kill the speaker of the House, and Mr. Pelosi’s recent legal troubles, to name a few—feed justified skepticism surrounding the alleged break-in and hammer attack that occurred in the wee hours of October 28. Details continue to change while leading Democrats including Hillary Clinton blame the incident, without evidence, on Republicans and Donald Trump.

This situation is yet another example of how the public’s complete lack of faith in major institutions is fueling doubt and suspicion. Unfortunately, that level of distrust extends to the Federal Bureau of Investigation, a once-revered agency that has blown its reputation in service to the Democratic Party. And news that the San Francisco FBI field office is taking a lead role in the Pelosi investigation offers little comfort that the American people will ever find out the truth of the matter.

The San Francisco field office, like the bureau’s Washington, D.C. headquarters and many other offices across the country, is mired in scandal. It’s particularly true as it relates to the FBI’s cozy ties to Big Tech—and the San Francisco FBI office is ground zero for that quid pro quo relationship. Rather than investigate the nearly 300 Big Tech companies within its Silicon Valley jurisdiction for various offenses such as election interference, the San Francisco FBI office appears instead to be in cahoots with these powerful corporate interests to do the Democratic Party’s dirty work.

Few people benefit more than Nancy Pelosi, who of course happens to live in San Francisco. Democratic candidates and lawmakers are flush with campaign donations from Big Tech; in 2020 alone, Facebook and Twitter—the latter located in Pelosi’s congressional district and the former located just outside its boundaries—donated at least $5.5 million to Democrats and only a paltry $435,000 to Republicans, a 12-1 ratio in favor of Pelosi’s party. Conversely, threats made by leading Democrats to break up Big Tech or hold congressional hearings into alleged malfeasance have been slow-walked since Pelosi reclaimed the speaker’s gavel.

Fortunately, a lawsuit recently filed by Missouri Attorney General Eric Schmitt laid bare how this lucrative back-scratching operation works. Elvis Chan, a top cyber FBI agent working in the San Francisco office, was in routine communication with Big Tech giants prior to the 2020 election to warn companies of “foreign disinformation” spread on their platforms—and the discussions just happened to coincide with the release of explosive materials found on Hunter Biden’s laptop. Chan is named as a co-defendant in Schmitt’s sweeping civil suit seeking to hold accountable government officials working behind-the-scenes with Big Tech to censor information considered hostile to the regime.

Snip

[Gay State Conservative]

If there was even a *bit* of credible evidence to indicate that it was some kind of MAGA she’s release it in a heartbeat.

[Col Frank Slade]

Kinda like the Martha’s Vineyard police investigating Ted Kennedy.

[hecticskeptic]

Who was in the car with Paul Pelosi when he got a DUI? Have you tried to obtain body cam footage?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I was thinking about that the other night and went back and reviewed the footage of the DUI event. The only camera was the one inside the police cruiser, but the audio was clear....it didn’t actually show Pelosi’s car but there no mention of a second person by the officer. The body cam footage would have been useful...

[Parley Baer]

What is she hiding? The FBI is on her side. Hahaha

[Gay State Conservative]

Was it intentional or was it a momentary lapse? I occasionally use “they're” when I mean "their" and “than” when I mean “then”. ;-)