delays in counting are not normal or typical ... and they only happen in Democrat states
they’re an indication that election tampering is going on
any normal election can be decided in 1 night
I always wonder, how is it, that decades ago, when many places still used paper ballots, that vote counting and election decisions were usually known that night, or the next morning.
But in these days of high technology, it now takes many days or weeks after election day, to know results.
Why did Alaska, with their ranked choice voting, take two weeks in their primary, to announce results? Granted there are additional steps to take with ranked choice voting, but we have the high tech equipment which theoretically should speed up the process. So what’s up with that?
Remember the 2020 Iowa Caucuses, in which Democrats allegedly had problems with some new “app” which was being used to report results? Unknown problems delayed those results. Yet in the days of “low tech” , results were known promptly.
Pennsylvania is in the USA.
They have computers and electricity.
The ballots can be counted in a few hours, not days.
CODE CRACKED ON ELECTION THEFT (Hostage Vanity From Nick Moseder)
Nick Moseder on Rumble ^ | August 4, 2022 | Nick Mosedee via Hostage
Posted on 8/4/2022, 4:49:04 AM by Hostage
12 minute video:
https://rumble.com/v1eo1ec-huge-counterfeit-ballots-being-injected-nationwide.html
Nick’s video outlines the elements of the steal. Whoever masterminded this was clever and very smart, but not completely.
Long short:
1. A voter marks choices on a paper ballot, not knowing the ballot’s calibration marks are deliberately off.
2. (Some) The paper ballots are therefore defective, and when scanned are diverted to a folder of rejected image files.
3. Replacement ballots with proper calibration marks are printed to match the rejected ballots and are rescanned successfully.
4. The voter markings of rejected ballots are ‘partially’ copied over to the replacement ballots.
The above steps allow for a particular candidate’s votes to be altered while preserving down ballot totals.
Note in passing:
Nick mentions Heidar Garcia from Tarrant County, Texas. Garcia is elections administrator for Tarrant County. Garcia is a native Venezuelan who came from Panama where he worked 12 years for Smartmatic. Smartmatic is ultimately owned by Soros.
Thank you very much and God bless you.
-————_——————_—————————
This is posted for further development.
The content gets moderately technical for those that are trained, highly technical for the untrained. Can’t fix gap in understanding yet without schematics, cartoons, everyday analogies.
But expect Nick Moseder, in concert with former Law Professor David Clements and his wife Erin (Erin is an engineer and is off the scales sharp), will in days ahead, perfect the mass media presentation to inform all Americans who are living day to day in a concerned state about our compromised, subverted election systems.
I will leave here a personal knowledge nugget. Each pdf printed paper has ‘microcode’ printed with it that has information regarding printer, print time, location, and other details. It requires special equipment to read the microcode.
I assert a reason that access is blocked to paper and image ballots for audits is that the embedded microcode will not match with scanned information.
I am old enough to remember:
ONE DAY ONLY OF VOTING
NO EARLY VOTING
NO VOTE BY MAIL
VOTE IN YOUR PROPER PRECINCT ONLY
SHOW ID
VOTE ON PAPER BALLOTS
VOTES COUNTED BY HAND
Results early next day.
CONVINCE ME THAT ANYTHING ELECTRONIC REPLACING THAT SYSTEM IS BETTER 3 2 1