[Jeff Chandler]

but he’s not wrong...

You are correct. You are also going to get thoroughly blasted here on FR, where unbiased analysis is not permitted.

President Trump could have chosen to have interviews in friendly venues, just as he could have tweeted more strategically. More sniper rifle, less shotgun blast.

In the end, the Left would have still lied about him, but why give ammo (and ratings!) to the enemy?

[Nifster]

He’s dead wrong

Are you’re knickers in a twist now?

[Sir_Humphrey]

How much you want to bet that those spewing vitriol towards BOR never actually read the article? If they did they would know BOR said Trump did great things for the country. O’Reilly only questions his tactics. He never said anything negative about Trumps policies; in fact he praised them. And to be honest, that's a legit criticism. If anything Trump was too trusting in the “journalists “ He gave them so much access it's as if he thought they would report the news in a fair and ethical way. If he did, boy was he wrong.

I guess actually reading the articles is not what a lot of freepers do. It's so much easier to deliver knee jerk reactions based on the headlines. But I understand Dems do it all the time so why shouldn't we?

[lewislynn]

And after all that bullshit advise from know nothings:
Trump accomplished more in one term than any other President in your lifetime.

Thank god he doesn't listen to you dingleberrys.

[frogjerk]

Trump has an ego and everyone knows it. And most people are ok with it if everything in the country is going good and it was until the China virus and summer of 2020 temper tantrum that many Dim Govs and local officials ALLOWED to get out of control.

Friendly interviews are good but you need to make appearances on not-so-friendly shows as well but sparingly. But certain people and venues should be a no go zone like 60 minutes and this idiot from the NY Times.